If anyone has a contact with a manufacturer feel free to share this thread, maybe they can post?
Nearly all manufacturers do not advertise/exhibit their product measurements? Why?
After my Audio Science Review review forum, it became apparent that nearly the only way one can determine the measurements of an audio product is wait for a review on line or in a publication. Most equipment is never reviewed or is given a subjective analysis rather than a measurement oriented review. One would think that manufacturers used tests and measurements to design and construct their products.
Manufacturers routinely give the performance characteristics of their products as Specifications. Those are not test measurements.
I searched the Revel speaker site for measurements of any of their speakers and could not find any. Revels are universally lauded for their exceptional reviewed measurements. Lack of published manufacturer measurements is true for nearly every speaker manufacturer I've searched for on line, perhaps several hundred. Same is true for amps, pre-amps, DACs, transports, turntables, well you get the picture. Do they have something to hide? I doubt the good quality products have anything to hide but poor quality products do.
ASR prides itself in providing "true" measurements that will aid in purchase decisions. Why don't the manufacturers provide these measurements so that reviewers can test if they are truthful or not?
Then there are the cables and tweaks for which I suspect that there are inadequate tests available to measure sonically perceived differences but which objectivists believe don't exist or are "snake oil."
Well, please chime in if you have some illuminating thoughts on the subject.
I would have loved to see manufacturers measurements on my equipment and especially those that I rejected.
- ...
- 518 posts total
Post removed |
Manufacturers (or, more accurately, designers) measure certain parameters of their gear as part of the design process, and then they listen and voice the product to achieve the final result. Selected measurements are used to develop the product specifications, which are summarized in the published manual. I suspect most manufacturers believe the product specifications provide sufficient information about the product performance so that buyers can make an informed purchase decision. If they believed it would help sell the product, then they would probably provide a full set of performance measurements. As you implied, there are exceptions such as Lamm that provided measurements of each amp and preamp they sold, and there are others. There are also designers/manufacturers who take pride in achieving certain performance measurements, such as Cees Ruijtenberg at Sonnet Digital Audio (formerly Metrum Acoustics) [linearity plot from Sonnet’s Pasithea DAC/preamp]. I suspect raw product measurements are sometimes massaged before they are documented in the published specification, and that every single measurement used in the design process does not always make it into the specification. However, when preparing the published specs, the manufacturers probably don’t stray too far from actuality in the event that John Atkinson, Amir, or another entity or publication decides to actually measure the piece and publish the results alongside the published specs. My Aerial LR5 speakers were measured by Thomas J. Norton, and the measurements were published in a review by Michael Fremer. As examples of why specs may vary somewhat from the raw measurements:
For an on-topic interview, Google "Why John Atkinson Believes Measurements Matter." |
@carlsbad Yes, I was banned in less than 2 hours. You can read about it on the Audio Science Review review on Audiogon. @mitch2 The real problem are cables and tweaks. Where are the electric and/or acoustic specifications (let alone measurements). So much puffery and exaggerated promotion without a hint of specs or measurements, in general. As to equipment, your examples of specs not conforming or relevant as measurements is also common. So often power output at reduced impedances are lower and occasionally at 8 ohms lower than actual. Impendence mismatches can be a problem. I purchased Legacy Signature IIIs from a guy with a Boulder amp and some boutique tube (unknown) preamp. They sounded quite awful which the seller admitted as the reason he was selling them. I brought a Sherwood 7100 16 watt 1970s receiver. It blew the seller away. Great mid-fi sound, including decent bass. He had already ordered other speakers so he let me buy the Sigs. Legacy speakers post high efficiency but they have low impedances with occasional sharp phase angles. While many decent 35 watt receivers can power them with good current/power supplies, other amps one would assume could power them (especially the bass) with 70 watts can't. I still think most manufacturers could do better. Even the speaker company I want to buy my future speakers from has very limited specs (Von Schweikert). |
- 518 posts total