above that i am much more concerned about RT60…… but overly treated rooms ….are sterile and lifeless….
Do YOU have a flat frequency response in your room?
The most basic truth of audio for the last 30 years is listeners prefer a flat frequency response. You achieve that through getting the right speakers, in the right position, in the right room, and then use room treatments and DSP to dial it in. If you are posting questions about what gear to buy and have NOT measured your room and dialed it in to achieve a flat frequency response FIRST you are blowing cash not investing cash IMO. Have you measured the frequency response in your room yet and posted it?
- ...
- 66 posts total
Says who? No concert I've ever attended had a flat frequency response and even if there was one of those out there, we ALL hear differently and some people (I'd guess most) prefer to hear some parts of the music boosted just a smidge, or maybe a lot. |
@mrskeptic , that statement is based on the research paper I posted on page 1: Flat on-axis frequency response is clearly the engineering objective for most of these systems. Those that deviate significantly earn lower ratings in double-blind subjective evaluations. And in section 3.6 Double-blind subjective evaluations of loudspeakers conducted by the author and his colleagues for 35 years have shown consistent preference for those having flat and smooth on-axis frequency response, accompanied by wellbehaved off-axis response—i.e., a smoothly changing or constant directivity index ([1] chapter 18)
|
@nonoise +1, hey, there is "wrong" way to do this hobby as long as you get what you want. My post was directed at the members posting that they don't have what they want, and asking what to buy/try next. I think that this is what people who are not feeling satisfied should try first. |
- 66 posts total