Honesty of the Reviewers


How honest you think the reviewers are? How often you see them saying one component is not good, most of time they will say this is the one of the best..... And you think when they say "I like it so I buy it." is more like " I get it free from the manufactor"?
bigboy

I tend to look at the review sites purely to keep tabs on new releases and also to find measurements and objective information.

 

Beyond that, I always put far more weight on forums and actual users who (most of the time) have nothing to gain or lose by offering honest feedback. And even better, conversing with other forum members with similar setups and preferences who are nice enough to share their thoughts on a particular component.

@grislybutter

Andrew Robinson?

That’s a little disappointing as I thought he was one of the more honest ones.

I remember a while back he did some videos on his struggles with audiophile addiction. Andrew Robinson is not only very experienced reviewer, he also seems to be one of the more open and candid ones out there.

He even goes as far as to suggest taking all reviews, including his own, as primarily entertainment value only.

 

I cannot believe what I'm reading.  If any of you Audiophiles really desired honesty in reviews / reviewers, you would not have destroyed Julian Hirsch and Stereo Review.

All it takes to be a reviewer these days is to ask, what is the MSRP?  The higher the MSRP, the mo' better it must be.  Also, knowing a few nonsensical words to describe things helps.

My favorite, "it's a nice well rounded amplifier, but it's not built for anger."  (what hifi)

 

Cheers

 

 

@cd318

before I came here, I read, for about 3 decades: car reviews. Every car that just was released got rave reviews and the others came in 2nd, 3rd and 4th. I could tell the pattern, the reviewer had to be able to

1) hype up the product

2) be able to defend their review later

3) be able to justify saying bad things about the product later

It was pretty obvious that they weren’t independent.

I find the audio reviews similar, although more nuanced, e.g., Darko never says: A is better than B, he’d say A is better in a small, untreated room ad B is better in conditions x,y,z.

And I am OK with it, I learned to infer the relevant information from it.

But when someone claims that the best speaker between 1 and 2 grand is one that is absolutely an inferior product to nearly any in the category (I would have a hard time finding a product that is worse), I will stop watching

re "primarily entertainment value only" 

well they are not that entertaining. We are paying dearly for watching those reviews, we better get some value out of it. Please. It's my time, my watching ads, my going through a bunch of info I don't need. 


Also, nobody mixes and presents information and entertainment well, they do either one. 

The funny thing about these youtubers is how much they talk about themselves. I understand that the reason people get in front of a camera is because they believe they are interesting and need to be heard but hanging a sign on the teleprompter: "it's not about you, it's about what you are reviewing" would help. A lot.