Digital enhancement

The Kevalin tweaks go up to $15k ,that’s waay out of my budget.

I think if you listen music with digital format,lossless or cd they will sound better with a simple matter too much tweaks affect the sound,or maybe some audiophiles use too much tweaks in the music systems has one the only condition, audiophilia nervosa.

He's selling expensive, run on sentences?

Can anyone here write a coherent sentence? It really does impact how an argument will impact readers. 

I am admittedly very confused. I actually paid close attention to Bacch-SP for a short while but could not get a good sense out of whether the processor/dac is doing something different or better out of recordings that are already great in soundstage and image. For example, comparing (with good headphone is recommended) this demonstration (by the inventor/developer) with the original recordings done in 1992 what are your thoughts? I understood the quality of on-site recording might downgrade the quality of sound from the processor but if the original recording has been great in SS, image, separation etc. what do I need additional processor for. Does the processor take a so-so recording, analyze it and apply 3D effect to it? I wish someone that has actual experience with the processor could shed some light,

(music starts at 01:17)

(Original recording in 1992)