Are solo efforts ever better?


I’m sure someone will think of something, but IMO, I can’t think of any artist that went solo and produced a significant amount of material that was “better” musically than what they did with their bands. Paul Simon did some decent stuff, but I don’t think it ever reached the artistic levels of what S&G did together.  Sting, Fogarty, Bruce…  I guess Diana Ross and Beyoncé were far more successful solo, but I think the Supremes and Destiny were more of window dressing for the star and less of a collective effort. Again, IMO. What do you think?  

chayro

@bdp24 

Maybe Monster could also mean popular. Pure Prairie League sure qualifies. Also Brinsley Schwarz, agree with you about Nick Lowe and Dave Edmonds (super talented).

I must say I was a Blondie fan from the beginning, seeing the band play in NYC 1976, 77. Debbie's solo work was weak. She had success with dance club stuff.

I think he took the bass  player and someone else too though. Got away from Jeff Beck. 

@brunomarcs 

That someone was Ronnie Wood. They formed The Faces with members from Small Faces.

It's a fine line between better and different. I applaud musicians who have the courage to make a clean break rather than staying in the comfort zone of their bands viz. Paul Weller, Mark Knopfler and Sting. Of those three, only Mark Knopfler's post-band music really appeals to me, but I appreciate what Paul Weller and Sting have done post the Jam and the Police.

First, a mea culpa on my part. Some of my above nominations are completely inappropriate in terms of the thread’s stated topic and intent, some of them noted by others as being sidemen who later became "leading men" (using the analogy of actors). I will also concede that most of my choices had not been in "monster" bands, but rather in cult-level ones. I don’t consider that distinction artistically relevant, but this is not my thread ;-) .

But there is one name that simply can not be ignored: Richard Thompson. While his output in Fairport Convention may be the equal of his solo work in terms of quality (imo an unnecessary comparison), his solo body of work is far more extensive in quantity. Live on stage Richard is absolutely, unbelievably great! See him before he dies :-( .

And then there is David Lindley. Though he made his name playing on the albums of many of the L.A. singers/songwriters, Lindley was before that in the L.A. band Kaleidoscope. I much prefer his solo albums, and live he is astounding! Sharp dresser, too ;-) .