Node 2i vs Cambridge 851N question

I am running the Cambridge with no external DAC. I have not tried the Orchid with the Cambridge because, honestly, it sounds fabulous as is. I felt the sound through the Node 2i and Orchid were about as good as I could get. It’s the whole disparity between Spotify and Qobuz that has me stumped. Spotify through the Node/Orchid sounds better than the Cambridge, but Qobuz is much better through the Cambridge. 

I am running the Cambridge with no external DAC. I have not tried the Orchid with the Cambridge because, honestly, it sounds fabulous as is.

This is an apples/oranges comparison.  You need to try the Cambridge with the Orchid with the same digital cable to make any assessments of the two as streamers.  My guess is the Orchid is smoothing over the deficiencies of Spotify whereas the more neutral DAC in the Cambridge points out the differences in stark contrast.  Just my semi-educated guess. 

Even without the Orchid, I had a difficult time telling what was Spotify and what was Tidal (at the time). I purchased a LUMIN D2 a couple years ago and returned it because I could not hear a noticeable difference between the Node 2i and the D2. I was a staunch critic of DACs sounding different. Now, I’m not so sure. 

@soix 

Very probable explanation. 

i recently bought an 851n and use that now instead of the Tidal streaming > 2012 MacBook Pro > Topping SU-8. I wasted my money. The Mac laptop with the fan blowing, USB connection sending me a low voltage shock while I simultaneously browse the internet sounded a bit better. I thought the culprit was Tidal Connect sending me a 96Khz sample rate vs the 192Khz+ of the MacBook Pro ,Topping combo. I hooked up a new Win11 laptop to the CA851n at 192Khz and noticed a bit wider soundstage.. but I feel the old setup was superior. 😝.