Empirical evidence is evidence.
Empirical, adj.
1. Relying on or derived from observation or experiment.
2. Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment.
3. Guided by practical experience and not theory, especially in medicine.
The first two are respectable uses and comply with scientific method. The third, rather sadly, lets us down more often than not. Much of what I was taught as a medical student in the 1970's was empirical, and now known to be wrong. Very quickly, one learns to put faith in double-blind, controlled, crossover trials rather than the word of an authority. I expect you used 'empirical' in sense #3, and while semantically I can agree that "Empirical evidence is evidence" I have to add it is poor quality evidence and one should not trust it.
Again, I will say I do not mind how other spend their money. It is when they tell us we should do the same that it is right to ask "Why?" and examine the responses carefully.
I have had a good explanation from the inventor and owner of the company â Sudkee, he made me promise that I would not post about the tech.
Ah, the secret technology. Well, of course, now we shall all believe. đ
You might be surprised, but my beef is not against you, as I said, I believe redemption possible. My reason for wasting my time here is that the thread attempts to get us to spend our dwindling resources on a product that has no theoretical underpinning, and which electrical engineers feel is unlikely to work. I'm not convinced by it being secret tech. If it works, patent it, then show us why and how it works. I'll happily eat my words if you show me solid evidence beyond testimonials.
Oh, and Happy Christmas to you too!