Streamer-DAC vs Seperates


I know this has been discussed before but I’m wondering if anything has changed with streamer-DAC combo boxes from Weiss, DCS, etc.  

I think the answer likely changes depending on how much you are spending.  Of course separates will win if funds are unlimited. Sadly, that’s not reality for most.  So, if one were to spend let’s say $15k or $20k on streaming and DAC capabilities, would it be better sound if divide those funds and buying separates, or just go for one of the combo options now?

I’m not sure why, but my system’s digital chain is the only area of my system that I didn’t obsessively scrutinize with demos before deciding.  I’m actually happy with my digital chain, but then again I have no experience with anything else, unlike the rest of my gear for which I’ve tested everything I possibly could.  I started by adding the Gryphon Diablo 300 DAC module to my D300 integrated.  Then I saw many liked Innuos so at the time I just sprung for a Zenith Mk3.  Later, I added an Innuos PhoenixUSB reclocker, and a PhoenixNET Ethernet switch.  So all in all I guess my digital component chain is worth about $15k, excluding the PhoenixNET network switch and excluding my Audioquest Hurricane power and Diamond USB and Ethernet cables.  Again, happy with the sound but really feel a bit embarrassed that I have no basis of comparison!

Back to my original question - if spending $15-$20k on streaming and DAC capabilities, would separates be better, worse, or the same as the popular combined options in this range? 

 

nyev

There is steady movement towards "all in one solutions." Integrated network transport/players plus DAC options are not only plentiful, but are dominating this space.

I really like my Bricasti M3 with integrated network player. I use Roon and did an A/B comparison between streaming with lumin u1 mini into the M3 via Audience USB cable and Roon with the M3 alone and preferred the M3. Sold the Lumin. 
What does this tell you? That it all depends. I wouldn’t bet on the same outcome if I had run the same comparison using something like Grimm, higher end Aurender or Taiko extreme. 
A built in network player isn’t an extremely expensive option and is even a default with some higher end DACs. 
Trying is the only way to know.

audphile  we have done the same test with our 432EVO server and the usb through our server sounds even better ino our M3 

 

 

 

Dave and Troy 

audio intellect NJ

bricasti and 432EVO dealers

‘“Trying is the only way to know.”
+1, @audphile1

@nyev

It appears you’re suffering from audiophilia nervosa…LOL! The irritating itch that keep surfacing every few days. Honestly, you got a darn good digital front end but instead of focusing on music, you can’t help obsessing over what else I can do or what’s next? Clearly, the DAC module inside Diablo is not engaging or musical enough to hold your attention.

Well, open your wallet and start auditioning DAC’s until you find the one that can outclass the DAC inside Diablo. I wouldn’t mess with Innuos trio until you solve the DAC riddle. I would consider a tube DAC like Lampizator Baltic to spice things up. Also recommend AQUA La Scala MKII Optologic or even Formula xHD.

IMHO, separate DAC and Streamer wins each time if you’re pursuing ultimate performance and flexibility. 

Happy Holidays!

Thanks for the perspectives! @lalitk , I’m not actually considering upgrading my digital chain at this point. As I said I’m very happy with my sound, and as of now I don’t feel the need to upgrade. I started this thread only because I am interested in the latest HiFi developments and the community’s perspectives, and my digital chain is an area I simply wonder about because I never went through the excruciating process of careful component selection. Despite that I think I landed in a pretty good place!

I have a few friends who are just getting into HiFi (or maybe MidFi but I won’t tell them that) and are ALL adding lower grade streamer-DAC combos which made me start wondering. They asked me if the combo approach made sense at their level and I said I really didn’t know (I had lots of advice on their other components). In the end they liked the convenience factor.

Also was recommending they try a variety of amps but the allure of McIntosh blue meters was too strong and they all went with MC462’s and the Mac tube preamp. Seems crazy they did that as I don’t think they realize the extent of the sonic differences amps can make - none had ever had a HiFi system before. I did test McIntosh separates when looking for an amp a number of years back and the Diablo clobbered all the separates I tested in that range.

I think it’s nuts they refused to test amps (they all tested speakers extensively). But I guess I didn’t test any digital options either… but I did go by community recommendation and not what gear looked sexy…