Dear @lewm : " I doubt any of us can hear the difference between 21 usec (high value for MC alone) and 23 usec (low value for MM. "
I always said the main characteristic of live MUSIC that can't be achieved by any room/system is: transient response, its speed. At the same time I posted several times that transient response in a room/system is mainly what makes the differences between different room/systems and between cartridges.
I posted what the electret cartridge manufacturer said on that critical subject:
" Response speed is general refered as transiente time and transient time is the figure of merit in comparison the ability of the cartridge to reproduce the instantaneous changes of MUSIC. ..........................................Musical sounds are transients by nature. ............................................These measurements of cartridge circuit are of great significance to the user and illustrate why the cartridge's electrical output network has such a profound effect on the overall performance of the playback . "
In your statement I think that some audiophiles can discern between those 3 micro seconds difference and that could says why gentlemans with a very high quality and resolution level systems are in favor of LOMC vs MM/MI cartridges.
In my today quality and resolution level room/system I'm aware of that kind of differences between a LOMC and a MM cartridges. Even through my fine tunning time over the last 2-3 years ( maybe a little more. ) the quality performance levels between MC and MM more and more were nearer and nearer in between and today if with your blind eyes you listen in my system a MM cartridge you can´t know if it's a MM or LOMC one. Differences as so tiny that you really need to know for sure what to look for to distinguish in between. Yes, color is a little different, to little.
I can say today that in any good room/system as nearer the quality performance level is between MM and MC as better your system overall quality performance levels.
The critical importance of transiente response/speed/rise time is obvious in the Lyra example I posted where reviewers and the majority of cartridge owners prefer by a tiny margin the Etna/Atlas SL versions vs its higher output models. I experienced that with the Kleos and Kleos SL.. Yes, the SL are a little faster with better transient response and this is what makes the difference because both cartridges have the same design and tested in the same room/system.
I know there are no measurements behind that ( or maybe are and I just don't know. ) but all those evidence are or could be in some ways facts to take in count when we are talking of the transient response importance in the whole quality performance of any room/system.
Maybe you have a way different opinion, that's mine.
R.