Who says studio monitors are "cold and analytical"?

Some speaker companies like ATC or PMC dont fit the mould because they have a foot in both camps. One in the audiophile market and the other in the Pro audio market. So THEY are the ones having it both ways not me.

@kenjit But here’s where more of ur circular reasoning comes in. If you look at a comparable model in ATC’s home or pro market, the only difference is the cabinet. They don’t “tune” their speakers for either market any differently and have achieved success on both sides. Then you present some ASR measurements that are somehow are meant to besmirch ATC. When you have to invoke ASR to make your lame point and infer that somehow that overrides the exceptional commercial success ATC has had on both sides, you’ve lost dude. The market has spoken and you’re just flat-out wrong. Speakers can be tuned the same for both professional and home use and be equally successful. Period. That some “dude” you found didn’t like how the SCM2000 ASL sounds (that speaker doesn’t even exist BTW) means nothing because he’s clearly in the vast minority. I can find someone who actually agrees with you. Don’t mean that’s reality. Fact is, you have no data to back up your contention that studio speakers sound like crap, then you throw out a buncha BS to try to rescue your initially flawed and way too broad statement. Face it dude, once again you’ve been outed and most people here won’t buy the extreme statements you try to sell here just in the name of extremism and outlandish statements. Chalk up another failure on your belt.

Someone forgot to take his pills today…

@retiredfarmer Wrote:

Well there are a lot of different  speakers made and only a few of them are worth owning. I don't find pmc,b&w or atc  ones that I want to own. 

I agree!

Mike

@kenjit

you said:

“Its just WRONG. Dont be afraid to say it. There is no such thing as analytical. A speaker needs to reproduce the input signal. Either its right or wrong. Dont give me this hogwash about it being analytical or accurate or pleasing. I like to think in terms of is it RIGHT? or is it WRONG?”

totally again put your foot in your mouth. You constantly talk about tuning to one’s ears. Now it’s you think about things in right and wrong, black and white. You a dummy boy. 

According to discussions Ive read, Pro audio users do not want their speakers to sound good. If they sound good they are regarded as colored...They want their speakers to be accurate.  As a result of this market need, the studio monitor industry was created in order to satisfy these needs. So these studio monitors are not designed by audiophiles or music lovers. They are done by engineers who have no understanding of music. They rely on measurements to guide their design along with user feedback, But since the studio pros themselves are not audiophiles, it is a case of the blind leading the blind.

The first key statement in this, and is endemic of all of @kenjit posts is the part of “According to discussions I’ve read…”.  That’s pretty much all ya need to know.  Why?  Because according to kenjit all speakers are trash and are fatally flawed.  Note, he NEVER lists components in his own system.  Why?  Because that would pin him down and hold him accountable for his own ridiculous statements.  As for the rest of this absurd statement I’m not even gonna waste my time.  He’s trying to infer speakers are only constructed by engineers OR audiophiles, and I think that’s silly because all speaker designers are ,of necessity, both.  If u guys wanna continue to read more of kenjit’s backfilling and circular reasoning go ahead but I’m done.  Anything else he says from here you can reference my earlier retorts and see why they’re complete BS, but I refuse to waste anymore of my time on this.  Someone else can retort and state kenjit’s obvious contradictions.  Good luck with that, and Peace Out and Happy Hollidays to all.  Yes, even kenjit.