Buying Equipment Based on Philosophy???


I realized that I buy most of my HiFi equipment based on the designers/ manufacturers philosophy.....Example: Nelson Pass,Pass Labs "First Watt"....Jason at Schiit,......David Haffler with Dynaco......Richard Schram/John Curl, Parasound...Etc... These designers/owners/manufacturers have a deep philosophy about the direction of their designs and their products. I realized this while looking for yet another power amplifier. I really didn't know much about Parasound. Then I saw a YouTube of Richard Schram talking about Parasounds history, direction and marketing/design philosophy......Impressive what he has done and such clear thinking about his company. So therefor, a Halo A23+ is on the norizon! 

 What say you? Does any of this matter in your buying decisions?

rbertalotto

I agree to a small extent, but when all is said and done, it’s my ears and bank account that determine what I buy. 

The technical design philosophy has absolutely nothing to do with my purchase decisions. Great way to make poor choices. To me, except in the lowest level equipment. Now, the design philosophy of Audio Research and Conrad Johnson is not technically oriented, but of the sound quality characteristics they want to achieve. But if that philosophy took them somewhere other than where I wanted to go it also would be of no value… I wouldn’t give a hoot about what they said.

Choosing based on specific designs or philosophy is a great way to get a ok sounding system, at best.

Yep. Philosophy of demonstrated excellent high voltage, low capacitance topology, point to point wiring, pi (choke) filtered power supply, handmade equipment built with the finest components; in other words, the finest possible.

I would hope that everyone would be influenced by design approach of the company in combination with their approach for marketing.

Some companies simply don’t present their products in a way that makes a compelling case to consider their products absent any other information.

I’m a member of several other audiophile groups and I’ve run across several people that are spending thousands of dollars on equipment without having even a rudimentary working knowledge of the product.  What pains me the most is when they try to assess why it does something or sounds a certain way because it breeds recommendations that are completely off base.  Things like evaluating the potential benefit of moving to a balanced connection by using an RCA to XLR adapter. 
 

I probably should have stopped before the rant escaped…

Although I appreciate a brand's philosophy...what it stands for, the truth is in the performance. People can say all they want but the 'proof is in the pudding' for me. Such is nature...a successful design survives.