2. digital
  3. 1207941255

What's likely to go wrong with a used CD player?

I came close to buying a ARC CD3 that was about 5 years old, had been "well-taken care of" by the owner and he assured he had operated it properly as per leaving it on 24/24. He has been the owner since it was just a few months old. But I just couldn't pull the trigger.

All I could think of is sure it's been problem free for 5 years, but the problems start after I take it over.

So considering the reputation of ARC gear, build quality, yada yada yada, and that hopefully it has had a good home, am I worrying needlessly and passing on what seemed to me to be a pretty good deal.

My primary interest in this player, other than the fact that it is an ARC is I'm looking to upgrade from my Rega Apollo to a balanced CD player to go with my upgraded system of a balanced preamp and balanced power amp.

Thanks for any thoughts,

Gene
gene_bonin
gene_bonin OP
8 posts
 
No, no A/B tests, unless of course I buy the ARC. Which of course then is very likely.

Most probably I'd be getting a properly operating player. So my real question is, considering this particular brand and model, what's the likelihood of anything going wrong for a while given it's already around 5 years old. I don't consider myself a heavy user.

I'm trying to decide if this is a good move vs. let's say saving my pennies for a while and maybe buying something like the MkII that is only a year or 2 old.

Gene
pehare's avatar
pehare
835 posts
 
sorry Gene mine sold today, the buyer recognized a good deal...sometimes you gotta move quick around here.......good luck
dweller's avatar
dweller
3,781 posts
 
Hello Gene,
I recently sold a Rega Appolo (damn fine sound!).
Wanted to be ready for Dolby True HD (way underestimated its transition from vaporware to reality).
Would love to hear the Saturn (which has quasi-balanced outputs).

As for your question, with moderate use, expect the laser to fail at the ten-year mark.

Purchased a Sony 10-disk changer around 1987.
Needed to replace laser in year 2000.

Otherwise it's still humming along!
salevick
77 posts
 
The comparison test was accomplished in my system. I tried the ARC CD3 MKII and the Apollo. In my system there was a significant difference. The issue of something going wrong always exists however my choice for sound was the ARC unit. The build quality of the ARC is better. The cost is more so it will be more expensive to repair upon need. The trade off is the better sound justifies the possibility of a pricey repair. Steve
tiger
313 posts
 
If your looking for balanced connects there are not two many choices. ARC makes great stuff, but they are not good values. However, ARC service has been, while expensive, always there. It will interesting to see what their new owners will do. to maintain that record. To protect your downside I would not pay more then 45% of the original list on the unit. The latter is about what a dealer would allow on a trade in.
More to discover