Audiophile sound quality from a more "mainstream" company?


I have owned some of the wellknown high-end  companies 

units. 

 

What I am wondering is have you had some success/good sound from some more mainstream, less high-end companies.?

jusam

The usual suspects all build some quality stuff.

Yes when the better portion of their audio department can have the freedom and budget to play. Having the capacity and the resources they can still create amazingly good sound also and at better pricing. One has to see what competitors components they posses just for comparisons and evaluation.

One last thing is, like in the past, many expensive stuff is not exported so we do not have the whole picture.

 

 

I had a JVC FX-1100 AM/FM tuner which performed well until it started having reliability problems.  It was a well-designed unit with lots of bells and whistles and jacks for two antennae, which would be useful for those trying to pick up stations from differing directions.  Kenwood also had a reputation for their tuners, although I have had no experience with them.  I now use a Luxman tuner that was Stereophile Class A in the '90s, and it still sounds good and works well. 

My old Harman Kardon Citation gear (preamp, amp, tuner) was nearly state-of-the-art at the time; so maybe HK was a high-end company that evolved into more mid-fi.  Those components performed well for decades. 

Schiit, Klipsch, and Pass. Wait...that sounds like an instruction...sorry...Heresy IIIs are better than IVs, or so I say.

The best overall amp I have owned in 30 years is a Technics SU C700.

One of the best amps under 5000$

Review of TECHNICS SU-C700 EG-S

 

I was using a NAD 3020 as a preamp with an early PS Audio Power Amp (can't remember the model) in the late 70's early 80's. Great phono section and the 80 WPC amp pushed any speakers I had. The 3020 was utterly unreliable but I fortunately worked for a large appliance retailer with a decent service department. That early PS Audio amp was relatively affordable, back then.