TT Arm-base Unipivot vs Gimbal-base Designs...

Both designs seem to be made in more/less equal numbers....and on all levels/price-ranges of TTs...so no real advantages on either?  Taking in to account a "synergy" approach of arm, base, cartridge then both gimbal & unipivot design can perform well/exceptional or poorly if mismatched...I get it.  Those with personal experience with both designs - advantages/disadvantages? If you had the option to step-up or upgrade your next TT system and offered the same table, same arm, same cartridge - but offered in a gimbal vs unipoint design...which would you choose & why? If it was your "last"/final TT - which design & why? Do you only look at the TT, arm, cartridge...unipivot/gimbal does not matter...is it just an afterthought... it comes with the rest of the system...so done deal?

My experience with a unipivot arm was a mixed bag. When it was calibrated, it worked fine but almost every time I wanted to spin vinyl, I had to recalibrate the arm(VPI 3D 10 inch unipivot). It was a total PIA. The arm was always cocked to one side or the other and I had to keep tweaking which I hate. After 3 years of ownership and not spinning many records, I traded in the Prime TT and bought the new Technics SL1200G with the magnesium gimballed arm. This TT is a keeper and now I spin vinyl joyously and very often. 

Theoretically I think there is less to go wrong with a unipivot.  With an arm with conventional bearings, the clearances are crucial to good sound and smooth operation, so if you opt for a well made arm. They needn't break the bank - even the lower end Regas have good production standards (although I much refer SME Vs.

I have one system using a Roksan unipivot and have been impressed with the decent sound and lack of fuss using it.

I've heard unipivot arms sound fantastic, including the VPI arm. Personally, they just give me the creeps because they seem all wobbly and fiddly. But that's just me. My preference is for a precise, rigid pickup arm, such as the SME V I've enjoyed for years.

Steve at VAS has a BIG VPI setup, with a uni-pivot arm base, with a nearby shelf, with a collection of uni-pivot arm wands with various cartridges. He tests, and demonstrates cartridges he builds/re-builds there.

It sounds terrific!

The base has VTA on the fly, ... and each arm wand has a mini din connector to a nearby din/rca junction box. pull the din connector out, lift the arm wand off, set it down, place the other arm wand on, connect it’s mini-din to the junction box, ready to play! Single arm base is one set of cables to phono stage which is adjustable/pass for MM.

Steve’s setup takes more area, there is no dust cover, thus not for me. My 3 tonearm setup is 3 gimbal arms, less area, removable dust cover. Mine is 3 sets of arm cables to a SUT, front selector for which arm, then select loading or Pass, then off to MM input.

More than 3 cartridges, a friend’s cartridge, it’s gotta be mounted in it’s own headshell for the Acos Lustre Arm with VTA on the fly.

Switch headshells: if cartridge body is a different height, adjust VTA (easy), then: azimuth has to be carefully confirmed/adjusted, both tracking force and anti-skate adjusted. And, when I go back to my cartridge/headshell: reset VTA, azimuth, tracking, and anti-skate.

I’m very quick, been doing it for many years, and got the hand coordination of the Acos-Lustre arm down, tools at hand, but it ain't instant.

I did not see Steve reset tracking or anti-skate when switching arm wands/cartridges, I need to ask him about that.

I gotta say, 3 cartridges he built (2 for me, 1 for a friend) sounded terrific on his uni-pivot arm wands.