Anyone care to share their opinion of the Vandersteen 2ce sig mkII?
I've been searching the speaker discussions and have found many comments. But wondering if anyone would like to chime in about the mkII specifically. I have a pair in my room for the last month and have done extensive comparisons to my Snell type D and Maggie LRS. They certainly are very good speakers! They image and soundstage really well. They also have good tonal balance and range. I can see why some say they are the best value around. But, there is something bugging me about them that I am trying to nail down.
For 2ce owners, what do you like best about the speakers? What are you using to drive them?
For those who have auditioned and passed on them, what was it you did not enjoy about them?
This is a tough decision to be sure! But, I can't keep another set of speakers, especially ones of this size. More listening to come as I try to sort my thoughts.
All opinions welcome
Agree with @holmz I have Vandy 1C’s, 2CE Sig’s (first series), and now Treo’s. Yes, a big Vandy fan, but they all can sound great. But, speaker placement, and the required tilt per the manual, is vitally important to sounding their best. You also need the anchors for the 2CE’s to sound best…..and biwire. Worth the effort, as Vandy’s, to me, are very ‘musical’, and a speaker you can listen to for hours on end. |
I have to agree with with most of the replies here that the Vandersteen sound great to what you throw at it. I currently have the 2ci powered by a B&K ST2140 bi wired in a pretty small room with the right tilt make it magic. Their are who mention that they are soft in the high end response but to me they just sound right. |
When on a trip 20 years we were discussing wines that we had tasted earlier. And our favourite one of the day was a Super Tuscan style, which I described as “there is nothing wrong with it”. |
