AUDIO SCIENCE REVIEW and $50 to spend.........


i found this website....

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?reviews/

looks like the guy who does the reviews plays with a pink panther figurine all the time... its a okay movie...but i dont like it too much. the reviews are so hard to figure out. i am lost for words and not totally understanding what i am reading. basically it seems like he does not like most of the audio products.

can i get AMAZING sound quality for only $50 ? my bank told me i cant make any withdrawals...my wife took control. now she is not talking to me. and she locked my bedroom drawer with a little more cash. but i have $50 so i can buy something online for my JVC earbuds...i have the JVC Gumy PLUS. the sound quality is premium but i want more. i am thinking of a DIVORCE. if my wife is not going to CHANGE!!

can someone help me find a good value audio product. i need some help. also the audio store told me "do not return" i dont know what is wrong with them. i said they were not very helpful. then the MANAGER said how can I HELP YOU?? i said...i have a team of audiophiles already helping me...you guys...

please help. thank you.i am so greatful.

128x128digitalviper

ozzy,

Is that the usual "let’s see if you have a resolving enough system" request ?:-)

Speakers:

Thiel 2.7

Joseph Audio Perspective Graphene 2

(Other speakers I’ve used include MBL Radialstrahler, a variety of Audio Physic speakers, Von Schweikert, Waveform, Hales Transcendence, Quads, and many more).

Pre-amps: Conrad Johnson Premier 16LS2 and a Benchmark LA4

Amps: Conrad Johnson Premier 12 monoblocks (as well as various other tube and solid state amps through the years).

Sources:

DIGITAL: Bluesound NODE streaming to a Benchmark DAC2L

VINYL: Transrotor Fat Bob S turntable, acoustic solid arm, Benz Micro Ebony L cartridge

JL Audio HP10 phono stage.

 

...why do you ask?

 

 

Thanks. It helps me understand why you are so negative on the benefits of equipment upgrades. And why you are so close minded about listening vs measurement tests.

Please no long-winded reply. Can you keep it pithy?

ozzy

@ozzy 

Well, since I went to the trouble of listing my equipment at your request:

Can you explain how my equipment list "helped you understand" that?

(And your conclusion is, unfortunately, a misrepresentation anyway of my view.  Look again at what I wrote to fsonicsmith1.  It's easy to throw out the label "close minded" but can you find anything actually 'close minded' or unreasonable in what I wrote?).

 

 

prof,

I'm only going by your total comments thus far in these forums.

ozzy

 

@ozzy

Why are you avoiding the question? You are now referencing my previous comments, but not my equipment list. My question concerned what you wrote.

You asked me to list my equipment. When asks why, you told me that my equipment list helps you understand why I am (to use your incorrect characterization) " so negative on the benefits of equipment upgrades. And why you are so close minded about listening vs measurement tests."

 

So...please...explain HOW my equipment list helped you reach that conclusion.

That’s what you wrote. I’m asking for you to explain.

What’s in my equipment list that supports your conclusion?

Are you avoiding this question because it turns out I don't listen exclusively via cheap "Chi Fi" gear? ;-)