The flip side of what you’re saying is that no care should be taken to make the amp easy to service and update??
Is it really a binary choice? What I am saying is making an amp easy to service and update should be part of it’s design and doesn’t need to be an expensive operation to perform. How hard is it to remove a few screws, unattach a few wires, and swap a module? I don’t see this as a problem with just about any other class d amp I have seen. It’s a feature built in to all decent amps, not something special or unique as far as I can see with your products.
Believe it or not, a certain portion of the market appreciates a quality build that doesn’t look like a denizen only suitable in a mancave.
Again, is it really a binary choice? Attractive design is in the eyes of the beholder but I see plenty of products on the market with nice looking cases for a fraction of what your product costs, and they are well made as well. There are some European class d amps that are very stylish for $2000-$2500 as I recall. Hardly in radio shack project cases. Again, a bit of a red herring.
As for a "forever amp", I would suspect that is a very small, and probably very old, segment of the market. A greater segment of the market is always looking for the next be all end all. Class d has evolved greatly in the last 20 years and no doubt will continue to do so. All one needs to do is to take a scan of the audio forums to see that people are always looking for the next big thing.
Amplifiers might change, but they will always need a power supply. So being able to update the amplifier with an improved module might not make sense to you, but it makes plenty of sense to our customers.
Huh? I don’t recall saying an amp doesn’t need a power supply- I simply mentioned that linear supplies in this day and age are rather archaic. I specifically said that a module swap was all most class d amps need to be repaired or upgrades, nothing innovative there.