I’m no engineer, but again, everything about this saga thus far suggests that it was/is fundamentally a hardware problem, and that it has yet to be fully resolved.
Again, Denfrips said recently that the firmware:
- Reduced the effect of Buffer overrun/underrun due to the Source’s Clock and the DAC’s Clock differences
which is a not so tacit admission that it is a hardware problem, as further underscored by the Cisco definition.
Given that, at least to my knowledge, this problem does not occur in the vast majority, if not all DACs produced by other high-end manufacturers, the obvious implication is that there is a hardware/clock problem with the Denefrips design that is simply not found elsewhere.
Put another way, if every other manufacturer of high-end DACs can say with confidence that such buffer overruns are not an issue, while Denfrips remains unable to do so, is it credible to argue that they alone are unable to develop good enough, associated software?