I truly did wonder why you thought Raul’s quote was humorous. Along the way, I could not resist the anatomical pun. However, I do know that autocorrect is a bitch.
My understanding of the classic REL set up is that the signal to the REL subwoofer is derived at the interface between the main amplifier and the main speaker. That full range signal is routed to the input of the REL subwoof amplifier which has a low pass filter before its input. The REL subwoof thus augments the main speaker at very low frequencies. This method does not result in reducing the bass frequency burden on the main amplifier or even the main speaker. Perhaps I’ve got it wrong. I suppose all this belongs on another forum, but drbond seems interested, and he is the originator of this thread. Otherwise, sorry for the digression.
drbond, The classic approach is to drive an electronic crossover from the preamplifier. The electronic crossover has built in active high and low pass filters, usually with adjustments for cut-off frequencies and a choice of filter slope. Sometimes an electronic crossover can also add gain to the signal. Raul and I were talking about using an electronic crossover only for a low pass filter to the subwoofer. The frequencies above low bass would go direct to the main amplifier, but at the input of the main amplifier, all you need to do is to add a single capacitor in series with the signal. That capacitor in conjunction with the input impedance of the amplifier will act as a passive high pass filter with a gentle slope of 6db/octave. For that, you would like to have a preamplifier with two pairs of output jacks, but it's not really mandatory; you can derive a second output between the main amp and the electronic crossover you use to provide the low pass filter to the subwoof. I like this second option because the high pass signal does not have to go through a second circuit. Trade-off is something called "insertion loss"; you lose a little gain in a passive filter, usually inconsequential.