I don't agree with Holmz in some cases, but for me to debate Holmz here would only confuse you further.
Or maybe it would not?
Suffice to say, as I said before, a properly integrated subwoofer will not give you the sensation that the cello is jumping from main speaker to subwoofer and back again. On that score, Holmz and I agree.
And we both are advocating use of a high pass filter between the preamp and the amp. I just buy mine, and others use a capacitor.
On the other hand, I am not a fan of digital filtering or digital shaping of the response.
People with DACS and streamer, and CD players are alreadily heaving inverted in digital tech…
It is easier to tolerate a DSP on the sub chain side.
And the HPF solutions we are both talking about are on the main L/R channel side,.
I am still trying to figure out the difference other than manufacturers sticker.
It looks like you fancy the Velodyn and I like the Vansdersteen.
Unfortunately, the more I read about HPF, the less inclined I am to use them: everything that I’ve read so far indicates that their use does impact SQ.
Well is there a link to that?
And is it a digital or analogue HPF?
Additionally, here’s a paragraph about higher order HPF influencing signal moreso than lower order HPF (but it is just the internet, which could be wrong):
There is slower transcient response, but if you have a speaker with a crossover, then I am not sure one can be a purist.
Although there is no limit to the order of a filter that can be formed, as the order of the filter increases so to does its size. Also, its accuracy declines, that is the difference between the actual stop band response and the theoretical stop band response also increases.
I think you might be talking about speaker level XOs that have the inductors.
The ones with capacitors are not large, as they are RCA level. The big ones are the size of a couple packs-o-smokes.