Duelund conversion to DIY Helix Geometry Cabling


I have been an avid user of the Duelund cabling for over two years now and have used them exclusively in my system with great results. I have built many for friends and have used a full loom of interconnects, speaker cables, power cords and an extensive wiring modification for a previously owned balanced power conditioner utilizing Duelund 600V PolyCast wiring which was transformative. My cabling desires can be a little addictive as I have owned and evaluated 40+ brands of cabling costing more than an entire stereo system!

Over the past six months I stumbled upon a thread here on Audiogon in regards to a Helix designed cabling and as you probably already know, I just had to look a little deeper into this cable design…After a month of studying and sourcing parts, I decided to reach out to the designer/architect, Williewonka who gave more insights and philosophy on how the cable came into existence.

That conversation got the ball rolling in converting one of my KLE Duelund interconnects to Steve’s Helix designed which only entailed replacing the neutral with a Mil-Spec 16 AWG silver-plated copper wire with the neural wire being 3 times longer than the signal wire and of course the “Coiling” of the neutral wire : )

After the modification was complete, I was not sure what to expect from the Helix cabling but I was quite shocked with the results with “ZERO” burn-in time…The sound stage became much wider/deeper with a much tighter/focused image and clarity/transparency is like nothing I have ever heard in any cabling regardless of cost. In fact, I just sold a full loom of a commercially designed Helix Cable that’s renowned around the world and has more direct sale than any cable manufacturer; these $200 DIY Helix Cables walked all over them…

I believe you will hear the same results as I have and have heard back from friends who have already modified their Duelunds with the same results; WOW! Remember the cables will need 200+ hours to burn-in and settle into your system. My system is now 90% DIY Helix to include IC, SC, PC and Coax with each cabling adding its beauty of an organic and natural presentation that draws you into the fabric of the music.

You can tailor the sound of your cables using Duelund, Mundorf silver/1% gold, the outstanding Vh Audio OCC Solid Copper or Silver with Airlok Insulation or your favorite wiring and you can change it at any time…

 

http://www.image99.net/blog/files/category-diy-cables.html

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/difference-in-sound-between-copper-and-silver-digital-cables

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/adding-shielding-to-existing-cables

 

Enjoy,

Wig


128x128wig

@toolbox149, I am hearing what you described and believe it or not, after last nights  session, considered adding a third 24AWG AG strand which would end up about 19AWG and easy enough to do.

Steve has tried, I think, 4 strands in parallel and claims no improvement heard, which gives me reason to be cautious.

However looking at what Kimber has done they seem to be successful with their Varistrand cable using multiple different gauges. I am now considering paralleling 26, 22 and 18AWG all in individual tubes together giving 1.28sq. mm, close to 16AWG overall.

Any brave souls out there willing to buy all that silver and experiment?

@pindac - apologies in the delay of my reply.

Regarding...

 

The Power Amp’ EE has asked for all devices to be in use, to be made available for the final testing to take place, as well as be supplied XLR Cables that can have a Earth Shield detached at One Connector.

The query is, does the Helix Design lend itself to this request from the EE.

I was not quite onboard with the EE’s inquiry, when questioning me about the Cables to be built, I am interested in meeting the request from the EE, and to have a Cable available with this as a option, which will be able to have a shield detached.

Unfortunately my practical experience is limited to single ended designs, because I have no components that share the balanced XLR architecture.

However I have some limited experience with XLR connectors and cables.

What the EE appears to be referring to is a floating shield approach.

For this to be effective there must be at least two llayers of seperate shielding

  • Where the inner layer of shield is connected to the ground pin of the XLR plugs at both ends
  • and only one end of the outer layer of shielding is connceted to the ground pind of the connector,
  • and the other end is not connected.
  • the thought is any airborn RFI is wicked away to the ground of the component where the shield is connected
  • this supposedly prevents the noise from entering the signal path and being amplified by the following "stages" of amplification
  • the connected plug must always be inserted into the "Source" component

The main issue these days is that many source components are of an insulated design (i.e. they have a two pin plug, so they are NOT grounded, which means this approach will be of little use because the noise is not wicked away.

With the design of the Helix, the helix coil "interupts" any external RFI

  • preventing noise from entering the signal wires, much like a faraday cage
    • making a seperate shield unessesary.
  • the Helix even works with connecting between a turntable and a phono stage on many systems
    • but I am aware of a couple of systems where noise was still an issue for some reason
    • these had to have a heavily shielded convetional cable

This link may help your understanding of where the "EE" is coming from 

XLR Conections

Hope that helps - Steve

 

 

@tecknik - apologies for the delay in answering the following

Williewonka@ what’s the influence of sound by the twisted neutral and ground”does a tighter twist over the live wires increase focus, air or timber of the ac cable.Williewonka@ what’s the influence of sound by the twisted neutral and ground”does a tighter twist over the live wires increase focus, air or timber of the ac cable.

I have not observed any changes in perofrmance when altering the diameter of the helix coil.

I intially believed there may be some benefit to having a larger coil, especially WRT speaker cables, which carry a higher voltage than interconencts, but subsequent work with power cables proved this supposition to be incorrect.

I do still believe that increasing the ratio of the Helix neutral to the signal wire, i.e. resulting is more turns, on those cables used between the turntable and the phono stage, could help reduce the amount of noise present on SOME OLDER systems.

  • But I have learned there are many systems that experience no noise at all using the more conventional 3:1 ratio.

Hope than answers your question

Regards - Steve

No problem williewonka,

Have you tried wrapping the live wire in copper mesh before winding the neutral and ground around it with the male side grounded?
 

would this increase capacitance or resistance effecting the dynamics.

The thought of wrapping the live with a copper wire mesh popped in my head but given the amount of work it will take I wanted some thoughts before I proceeded.

 

thanks ,

steven 

 

@tecknik - I've found shileding on cables impacts the openess, so I never use it.

Also the Helix coil acts like a faraday cage, which makes the need for a shield redundant.

I've clenched a Helix power cable next to a Helix interconnect in my fist with the volume at full volume (no music playing) and the resulting hum was barely audible

I did have one instance where a friends very old tube system created a hum with a Helix Interconenct connecting the turntable to the amp's internal phono stage. So he had to use a conventional shieided cables for that duty..

But I have also had reports from many others that there was no hum present in that situation on their more modern systems.

Personally, I have never had a hum issue due to the helix interconnects, so I have never pursued using a screen on them

 

Hope that helps - Steve