Børresen M3 vs. CSS (Jay Iyagi) vs. Wavetouch

I was only comparing the Borresen to CSS by Jay. Sorry didn’t mean to imply anything beyond those two. I’m sure your speakers are world class too. Peace!

1. Borresen

2. CSS

3. Wavetouch

The foundation of the music and voice is MIA with the Wavetouch. That makes it tough to judge it in any other meaningful way. 

csmgolf

1. Borresen 2. CSS 3. Wavetouch

The foundation of the music and voice is MIA with the Wavetouch. That makes it tough to judge it in any other meaningful way.

Your ears are in un-natural hearing mode by M3’s un-natural sound. A’philes can switch quickly between natural and un-natural hearing modes. To un-natural mode ears, WT and the original music are a kind of out of phase because they are natural sounds. If you listen to the original music (or WT) for few minutes, WT and orig music sounds normal and clear. And M3’s sound became veiled, vague, soft, and out of phase un-natural sound.

To your spouse and friends, your audio sounds veiled, vague, and out of phase (hurts their ears) since they can’t switch to the un-natural sound quickly like you. Alex/Wavetouch

Is this the Kenjit-lite version of speakers? 

The Wavetouch compared to the original file did not sound alike. The Wavetouch sounded like a 12 year old boy before puberty. The original file sounded like a 30 year old man that has actual bass in his voice. If threadbare and thin is natural sounding to you, great. How do you know whose ears hurt here? I think maybe Arafiq has it right. You asked for opinion, and then didn't get the praise you felt like you deserved.