Why would there be? You talk about how every other speaker is crap and “only natural sound is WT”. Did you come here for compliments? Natural and un natural is subjective and to my ears on the BS YouTube video your speakers don’t sound very good. Sorry.
Børresen M3 vs. CSS (Jay Iyagi) vs. Wavetouch
Børresen M3 vs. CSS (Jay Iyagi) vs. Wavetouch
Warning! If you have a weak heart, don’t watch these videos. This music may lead a pounding heart. A reason GR (song writer) didn’t put more bass.
Please post your favorite, opinion, or thought. Alex/Wavetouch
Original music https://youtu.be/bn_NTLlX1FU?t=32
Wavetouch audio https://youtu.be/8pgXyqMdlLE?t=48
Børresen M3 https://youtu.be/tapjNr9P20M
CSS (Jay Iyagi) https://youtu.be/npNqik_dz60?t=394
- ...
- 26 posts total
"I read every posts in this thread and there is none promoting my products" Promotion of your product: 1) You started a thread to get people to listen to a clip of your speakers 2) Then your comments: - " WT is closest to the orig music and WT is natural sound like the orig music" - "WT is the most closest to that voice. There are flesh, bones, and focus like real music in WT sounds to my ears" - "Both orig music and WT sounds are very much similar than with M3 sound. if WT sound lacking body to your ears at the time, the orig music sound might be lacking body too to your ears." - "your ears could be in un-natural sound hearing mode after hearing M3" There's your promotion of your product
|
I admit those words look like promotion. I see it now. I'll not post in this thread any more. This thread will be forgotten soon. Alex/Wavetouch
|
- 26 posts total