2. amps-preamps
  3. 184917-150037

So many YouTube clips to evaluate sound quality. Why???

There are several audio gear Youtubers chronically playing clips displaying speakers and amplifiers and even cables to have YouTube listeners evaluate sound quality.  And then they go to shows and display music clips from the very small Hotel rooms.  And yes I watch a few and some can be interesting. It's gotta be tough for these manufactures to go to these hotels all the time and deal with all the people. Basically, it's a mixture of all kinds of higher end components and somehow it's possible to appreciate what individual components sound like. $200,000 speakers surrounded by lots of other high-priced gear. How does one charge anything?

Are they trying to fool people with sound comparison music clips? What is the point and why are they wasting their time?  Maybe headphones might detect something.  I fail to appreciate why these individuals do this, and why do they dedicate so much time to this.  Are they being paid to promote speakers and amplifiers?  And then reading the comments where all these people seem to really believe they hear differences.

Time might be better spent explaining technical merits of the gear and opinions on how it sounds. And why their recommended gear is so expensive.  
 

 

emergingsoul
emergingsoul OP
1,124 posts
 

Another factor is the quality of the recording itself. Really good recording quality songs sounds great on any system.

The audio Youtubers have minimal views anyway.  It's kind of impressive they spend so much time doing these videos and yet they don't make any money from the videos clearly.

And then you have the backend which is people signing up for additional services for special care treatment Via patreon style marketing efforts which can be rewarding but this is difficult. Seems to be a cesspool and I wish they just spend time speaking about the quality and characteristics of the equipment versus the dribble.  
 

Also the touting of 100 Thousand dollar systems, $300,000 speakers, $30,000 power cords is absolutely ridiculous it hurts the Industry.

 

Post removed 
stuartk
2,766 posts
 

For whatever it's worth, John Darko has said the primary function of his channel is entertainment. 

Ag insider logo xs@2x
bruce19
246 posts
 

I answered my own question, and here is the answer for anyone interested. These are the specs for YouTube quality for audio. Actually, it looks like you can transmit high quality audio given the availability of flak and wave formats, however than the unknown becomes the microphone quality and the recording process. 
 

Audio file guidelines

The following guidelines are for audio tracks that you provide to YouTube. These guidelines describe the formatting specifications that yield the highest quality for playing audio on YouTube and for matching your audio tracks to the audio tracks of user-uploaded videos. Note that an audio track would only be played back on YouTube if you have opted to include that track in YouTube's AudioSwap program. Generally, we recommend that you upload the highest quality audio possible.

  • Supported file formats:
    • MP3 audio in MP3/WAV container
    • PCM audio in WAV container
    • AAC audio in MOV container
    • FLAC audio
  • Minimum audio bitrate for lossy formats: 64 kbps
  • Minimum audible duration: 33 seconds 
Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
5,944 posts
 
emergingsoul

Really good recording quality songs sounds great on any system.

That’s probably true, but YouTube uses lossy compressed audio, and it sounds like it, especially on a real audio system. I think most YT creators hope to become influencers, and some certainly strive to create a niche for themselves. We’ve seen a few do that here on A’gon.

More to discover