Garbage In Garbage out


I stumbled into an interview with the guy who owns Danielhertz.com- you may have heard of him. /snark.  Actually I was on youtube watching @OCDHIFiGuy who had an interview with the guy you may have heard of.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cc16zy73Kg 

Anyhow, I watched about 2 hours of Mr. Mark talking about the backasswards Hi Fi industry and how hedge funds have bought once venerable names and turned them into mass market Mid-Fi. For example Harmon Audio owns his name and brand and has diluted it. McIntosh is another example of corporatized Hi Fi. Post W. Zane Johnson Audio Research seems to have fallen away as well. (I'm hoping the new owner is a purist)

What really struck me was how Mark detailed the variability in the original studio gear as it recorded a session  and how it can make for some really lousy recordings. "Audio systems don't reproduce music they reproduce recordings of music" 

He talked about the Holy Grail original highspeed analogue master tape and how it cannot be reproduced without discernable loss. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4l_SKycM4o

He also had what I considered a brilliant observation on how inefficient speakers are turning wattage into heat (like your car brakes do) and the result is lost detail. He likes -100db or better efficiency. He quoted Nelson Pass on "The first watt is the most important watt" and cited the Bell Labs 1936 papers and how advanced they are and how they influenced great audio men like Klipsch and Pass.

Some hours later I am re-thinking my entire (apparently mid-fi) existence. 

 

 

128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xyesiam_a_pirate

@perkadin 

"Being successful in this industry takes great marketing."

Very true. Think about a company like McIntosh.

Do you for one second think they would still be relevant in the marketplace if they decided to ditch the glossy black faceplates and sexy blue meters?

And it's not just the audio industry, it holds true for every industry. 

 

@recklesskelly no thanks. That’s what caused the belly ache in the first place.


As for the whole high vs low sensitivity debate, the claim that speakers need to measure high in sensitivity is nonsense.  The whole argument falls apart pretty quickly in practice.  Take an 85db speaker and compare it to a 100db one.  A 15db difference would imply the high sensitivity speaker is 5x louder or in other words, uses 1/5 the power to equal the same volume.  My Dynaudio Heritage speakers just happen to be 85db efficient and I’ve played around with the Klipsch Heresy enough to know that it’s not 5x louder.  It’s not even a 2x or 3x.  It didn’t take much difference in dial to get them to even out.  And yes I realize an amps volume isn’t a linear increase in power but neither is the way we perceive sound.  I was also able to achieve sufficient listening volumes with a 50 watt tube amp so what’s the point of using high sensitivity speakers?  Go with whatever sounds best, there are always pros and cons.   The first speakers I ever owned were the Cerwin Vega AT12s, which measure 97db.  It didn’t take long for me to blow out the mids and tweeters in college.  I played them loud, developed a bunch of heat and melted the coils. A very expensive lesson in high efficiency speaker design was learned.  One thing I like about Dynaudio is they make bullet proof drivers.  I’ve had a pair of the original Contour 1.8s for over 20 years and not a single blown driver and I still frequently hit the mid to upper 90 DBs at my listening position, especially when watching movies.  I’ve plugged them in wrong, I even shorted an amp once with them plugged in, fried the amp but the speakers were fine.  I doubt too many 100+ db designs would last as long in my possession.  I might give the Heresy’s another go, the mark IV looks like a good update.

 

 


 

 

 

Hang on, another opinion extolling the virtues of powerful amps and inefficient speakers is right around the waveguide.