We have standards in video.
Yes and it is a good thing...
But sound is not images...The qualities of an image are easy to define in a consensual way...
The qualities describing sounds are not...
Yourself you dont even accept anything "colored" "musical" etc you claim they are WRONG...
Neutrality is good but wanting neutrality as a perfect obligatory mandate in design will cost something... You are not God and you cannot decide that tomorrow all trade-off choices in audio will be declared unlawful and only pure abstract neutrality will be the goal and the only qualitative adjective usable for describing a good sound or a PLEASANT ONE...No more pleasure because it is illusory if i read you right... Only perfection is acceptable... The problem is by definition of what is a trade off in audio no perfection exist from recording to speakers..
As i say you had your own hearing theory...Imposing it is not possible and doable anyway...
Human dont hear as a Fourier analyser, so useful it is for designing ALL audio components...
Than human hearing own a future and will rule future design not the reverse...
By the way we dont have a singular accepted theory of human hearing... What we know is that human hearing work as a non linear tool in his own time dyssimetric dimension by history and evolution fatefulness.. Then let the designer create their own trade off choices...I am not against some regulation but i dont want society of audiophiles being ASR disciple repeating measures mantras as synonymus with good sound... 😊
It remind me of some transhumanist who are really sure that man must become part machine to compete...How do you falsify that claim ?