As just a “normie” who spends some money on audio, a pox on both your “measurements rule” and the “golden ears” side that dismisses anyone not “trained”..
I buy what is pleasing to me. Don’t give a dang about “measurements” which mainly are measuring that which is beyond audibility for anyone over 40 that has actually had any kind of “blue collar” job.
Got it. Thank you.
Can I tell the difference between consumer grade klipsch vs magnepan and tektons? Absolutley. (I have all 3).
Nobody was debating that but thank you again for stating that.
Can I tell the difference between an underpowered amplifier and one with sufficient power for the dynamic range of what I listen to and how loudly I listen to it? Yep.
Excellent. Again, no one was debating that. Question is how you can tell that before you get the equipment to listen to. I provide that information with measurement and sometimes with listening tests.
Can I tell that I prefer tube amplification for mids and highs, using SS amps for lows and subs for under 100hz (for music)? Yep.
So you say. We have no way of knowing if you really can or not.
Can I tell the difference between a 192/24 vs mp3, especially as volume increases? Definitely.
So you say. We have no way of knowing if you really can or not.
Can I tell that I prefer a $2000 tube amp over the same power $20000 tube amp?
Or at least hear no difference..? Yep.
The second part I can believe. The alternative, "we have no way of knowing if you really can or not." :)
What I buy, and what equipment provides me with hours on end of continued listening enjoyment, at a price point I am willing to pay, has NOTHING to do with some elitist, sneering, snob telling me that I am “wrong” because my equipment doesn’t “measure up” or that my choice is wrong because some “golden ear” says so.
Again, got it.
THAT is “my kind” @amir_asr
Very clear now. Thank you again.