What do you talk about..
For sure the debate with you was not about acoustic...
it was more deep and more fundamental but you never answered my points about hearing theory and the different meanings associated with different measures...
The debate was : how could someone predict sound qualities and their perception based on a finite set of linear measures of the design of pieces of gear ?
How could he dare seriously promote it as predictive of audible Qualities ? it is non sense in psycho acoustic basic..
you fail the audiogon discussion exam...😊
By the way i dont claim expertise, Toole is expert...
Me i only at no cost tuned my room... Thanks to him and to those who spell me the basic to experiment with...
Asking measured proof is like imposing the same question for any problem and imposing blind test is as imposing an answer for all problem ... It is ridiculous ... An answer cannot be at the same level than the question save for children puzzle book of algebra or for car seller ...In psycho-acoustic, the Fourier method is one of the question the answer it pose reside out of the Fourier frame... Using the two hearing theory in complementary experiments is the road to go, especially a road already studied in hearing impairment research...
psycho acoustic is based on fundamentals questions... This interest me not your marketing of toys as replacement for listening...
