Listen with your skin.

There is a context for my half joking sentence...

Have you read the scientific american article ?

Then i wrote a joke inspired by a bible WELL KNOWN proverb to make a metaphor for the way the skin react to air vibration and to speech...

Speaking to fools or speaking to the wind are metaphorical synonym here for everyone who understand these expressions , in clear they have the same meaning...

Then your demand for "rectification" or accusation about making things up , is a bit exagerated ...

No ? 😊

Then the one who try to make thing up here is you right now with my innocuous post ...

It is called a "tempest in a cup of water"...

Is it in the Bible?

I dont think so... But it is a long time for my old memory... 😊

But in a quantum cup of "water" there is always some big tempest, and the "void" is windy so to speak...

I now suggest to be relax and going back to sound and hearing...

Only one would ask such a question ?

WHY?

Because you’re making things up?

The book either says it, or: it doesn’t.

Simple as that!!

Have you read the scientific american article ?

                      Yes.

Proverbs 23 ;

"Dont speak to fools..."

                      OK!

We can hear with our skin in some way... This is not so surprizing...

but i am very impressed by Alain Connes thinking about primes numbers and music...

It is too complex to speak about it here...

 but please go to this short youtube  piece...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBArTv71Edk

 This is a translation of the primes in music , by a recipe Connes explain in some conference, i dont remember which one...

 The amazing fact, is that the most complex object in the universe is the prime distribution...

 Here an image  of the first part of this "object":

Now think about that,  each notes represent a circle in this INFINITE field without repetition...

I think in his core mathematic is music ...

I try to be friendly , perhaps you must try it instead of insulting people...

Did i ever treat you as a fool ?

NO.........

If i remember well , it is rather the opposite...

 Then...........

Proverbs 23 ;

"Dont speak to fools..."

OK!

I’ve long claimed that live music is a full body experience, while most reproduced is more heard than felt. Part of that is a matter of SPL, another is that very few hi-fi systems reproduce the bottom octave (20-40Hz) at all, let alone at the SPL produced by PA systems.

But it’s still more than THAT. At live shows I hear the enormous sound of the venue (one reason I would love to own an Eminent Technology TRW-17 Rotary woofer, for frequencies 20Hz and below. Not that most recordings contain any information that low in frequency), and feel the buildings’ structure vibrating under my boots (Tony Lamas ;-). Reproduced music is mostly an intellectual experience, at its’ best becoming an emotional one. But still not a physical one.

There’s a big difference between watching a movie and being in one. But since most recordings are made in small rooms (studios, some of which are surprisingly small), comparing recorded sound to live is like apples to oranges: they are completely different entities. The most we can hope to achieve is for reproduced voices to sound as they do in life, and the same for instruments.