Most people like music , they are sensible to melody and rythm...
They only perceive melody and rythm flowing and beating in TIME and in their body ...
This melody or this beat affect them , anywhere when they listen to it again , on any type of system , most the times bad sound systems... it does not matter to them because the rythm and melody they like are RECOGNIZED AND FELT...
Some people love music so much they did not hear it only in TIME and in their body but in SPACE... They see it.. they like not only the RECOGNIZEABLE melody and the rythm but they hear and want to hear the "timbre" experience , they want to be "immersed" in the musical event , with all spatial dimensions of the sound, they wanted to be included in the music flows... ...
It is the texture of the sound that affect them , and his disposition in space....Not a mere favorite set of recognized melodies and rythm...
Some people are obsessive compulsive in character they will set a goal and they will stay unsatisfied because their goal is not acoustical so much , as a goal related to the gear components themselves... They will appreciate any change in sound texture and dynamic , but without acoustic knowledge and more focusssed on the gear performance, they will upgrade without end.... Price, appearance, design specs, will matter more than the embeddings of the gear in his acoustical space...
Acoustic is the end line and starting line.... The gear piece are only tools in this acoustic journey...For me and for many others...
Is music more than melody and rythm ? Yes music is also an harmonic and acoustic phenomena .... Scriabin is not melodic , Shonberg is atonal, an indian raga obey other rules of tonalities and rythm, A didjeridoo cannot be listen to nor a gong in the same way a classical orchestra must be listen too or a Bob Dylan songs ...A small free jazz ensemble is not a set of german dance music with beers...
There are audiophile using their improved sound experience who will explore world music , and they are those who are satisfied by which they had already recognized all their life and what they already know...
They are many kind of audiophiles...
For example , i dont give a damn about home theater because i dont listen much movies and anyway i am not very attracted to movie sound effects or movie music...Even with much money i would build an acoustic room for music but not a home theater... As you see they are many kind of audiophiles... Many more species than the main one i enumerated here...
I was an audiophile for 10 years to realize my dream of a good sound system to serve my musical various appetites .... Acoustic had reveal to me the only road toward satisfaction , a hard road in learning how to hear and how to listen .... Now i use headphones , i am lucky , to have picked the right one after the lost of my dedicated room...
I know which can be the only possible real upgrade for my system ... It cost many more than all my system.... Happily i am satisfied and i did not know if i will be able to upgrade or not but this does not matter anymore after reaching the minimal treshold of acoustic satisfaction... It is an acoustic treshold determined by objective factors not a price tag treshold determined by marketing...
Half musicians are workers who dont need an audiophile system... The other half of the musicians need an audiophile system... my statistic is metaphorical here but the difference in the musicians crowds reflect the difference in the general population why ?
Because music is one thing , acoustic is another thing... They can blend or they can be set apart... Some people need the two , some need only one, and some people dont need any of the two...