McIntosh MCD500 vs Marantz SA7S1


I recently had the opportunity to spend a few hours with each the Mac MCD301 and MCD500, both were excellent performers, with the MCD500 being a bit fuller with a hint more detail.

I also listened to the Marantz SA7S1 a little while back, thought it was a very good player as well, but definitely not as smooth or musical to my ears as the Macs.

I'd be interested in others opinions on these players, especially if you have any extended listening experience.
rjhalla
Absolutely, I didn't think to run direct while I had the 301, but sure wish I had. The SA7S1 was plugged into XLR1 and the 301 was plugged into XLR2, the SA7S1 was in my system for far longer than the Mac, but my preference for the Mac really began when I listened to the Corrs. I love Andrea Corrs voice, the Mac seemed to capture it the way it was live, whereas the Marantz seemed to try and add something....specifically what I don't know. But in a nutshell I felt the Mac was more honest than other players, and whether I was listening to CD or SACD, the music was great.

Love my PL300's, but they often reveal things I don't want to know. Poor recordings are now unlistenable, but good recordings are so well resolved that I just sit back and enjoy.

Back to the digital players, regardless of the selection, be it the Mac, the Marantz, or even the Ayre, I don't think anyone can go wrong....it just really boils down to system goals and personal preference.

Rick.
The reason you like the Mac better is because of the Monitor Audio. The reason I like the Marantz better is because I run Vandersteen 5A. This all makes sense now.