McIntosh MCD500 vs Marantz SA7S1

Actually, regardless of the preamp the ideal would be to feed directly - anything you can remove from the path the signal has to follow has to be an improvement.

The pre in question is a Sonic Frontiers Line 2 SE that was just back to Parts Connexion for a once over - all was perfect - so....again, removing something from the signal path is better.

In direct comparison between the SA7S1 and the MCD301 the Mac improved the width and depth of the image in front of me, and the sound was definitely fuller. Bass was tighter and deeper with the Mac, and the highs were smooth and very focussed.

When I heard the MCD500 I noted these qualities as well, albeit that particular audition was not in my own system.

My home speakers are Monitor Audio PL300's with the ribbon tweeter; everything in front of these speakers is scrutinized at a very high level.

It always boils down to personal preference, but the only way to have that preference is through spending some reasonable period of time listening.

I only suggest that buyers get out and hear the new MCD500 or the MCD301....and make your decision based on what you hear.

Rjhalla,

I assume that in your direct comparison between SA7S1 and
MCD301 both players were connected through same preamp?

Your previous post is somewhat inconsistent with your last comments.

"I honestly believe the Mac 201 beats them when run
direct, I hope to know soon just how much better the 301
or 500 sounds when run direct."

By the way very good speaker choice. I have listened to new Monitor Audio Platinum series and these are great speakers. The PL300 that I listened had really good imaging and nice sonics.

Absolutely, I didn't think to run direct while I had the 301, but sure wish I had. The SA7S1 was plugged into XLR1 and the 301 was plugged into XLR2, the SA7S1 was in my system for far longer than the Mac, but my preference for the Mac really began when I listened to the Corrs. I love Andrea Corrs voice, the Mac seemed to capture it the way it was live, whereas the Marantz seemed to try and add something....specifically what I don't know. But in a nutshell I felt the Mac was more honest than other players, and whether I was listening to CD or SACD, the music was great.

Love my PL300's, but they often reveal things I don't want to know. Poor recordings are now unlistenable, but good recordings are so well resolved that I just sit back and enjoy.

Back to the digital players, regardless of the selection, be it the Mac, the Marantz, or even the Ayre, I don't think anyone can go wrong....it just really boils down to system goals and personal preference.

Rick.

The reason you like the Mac better is because of the Monitor Audio. The reason I like the Marantz better is because I run Vandersteen 5A. This all makes sense now.

Agreed.