Pangea 9 vs 9se


I realize that there has been one thread dealing with the Pangea 9se.

I am interested in a comparison between the two.

I owned the 9 version, and sold it because i did not like the treble response.

i would be interested in the 9se, for use with my monoblock amps, if the bass is deeper, fuller and the treble is smoother, compared to the 9.

thanks for your hekp
mrtennis
Post removed 

fan of pangea ac9 as well, ran some cable tests via an ahb2 amp and was very impressed. the bass w the ac9 had a tad more punch than with both kimber pk14 and pk10. it is definitely a darker cable, the midrange lost some detail but still very musical, if your system mids are on the bright side this could be a good thing. where the ac9 fell a little short was upper low range, ie an upright bass had great low range punch but the detail of the plucking of the strings was not as clear as w the kimber cables. the kimber cables had much better top end, airy, additional fequency range and detail. the low end w kimber had some nice defintion but i preferred the punchy ac9. ultimately kept the kimber pk10 but the pangea gave it a run for its money besting it w the punchy bass. for the money the ac9 is a stellar cable. it is relatively cheap, free, easy returns on amazon so your only excuse not trying this is being to lazy to put the time in to improve your system.

Hopefully the OP has found his power cord and is ok. He hasn’t posted since 2014.