Why Don't More People Love Audio?

Eagleman6722,
Ok! I now see what YOU mean by "analytical". OK, each time I read "analytical" in your text, I'll substitute it with my equivalent word for it - "discriminating". To me "analytical" means somebody critically dissecting the sound into dynamics, soundstage width & height, transparency, air, blah, blah.... All those audiophile words you might have read time & again.
I think what you are after is good & excellent recordings that make the music sound more real rather than the mass-produced CDs you find @ Walmart. Am I right? If so, in my words you are a discriminating music listener rather than an analytical music listener. Anyway, IMHO. FWIW. YMMV.

Bombaywalla,
Actually I am both. Discriminating as you describe for CDs and records that sound good and analytical. I just changed tubes in my Audio research sp9 Mk2 to Amperex USN-CEP's which completely changed the character of the pre. Last week I bought a TAD-150 on the write ups and advise of Agon members to see if I am getting the best bang for the buck. One of the pres will go, probably the ARc if I agree with the reviews. Then in March when I have a little spare coin , I am sending my McCormack DNA-1 to Steve McCormack for a Rev -B upgrade. So i guess I evolved from discriminating to both over time....

Eagleman

Hi Rex, I'm happy you have found the system of your dreams. Nope the problem is not coloration. As I said before, I really think the problem is that systems are voiced for people who have a lot of money to spend and most of those people aren't listening to rock. The sytems that "are", have bumped up, underdamped, bloated bass and sometimes a bright tweeter.
Why don't more people love audio? One reason may be because high end audio is not voiced for popular music ("Popular" meaning what most people listen to).

Sorry, Cdc, but I think your "theory" is ridiculous.

Hi guys, I'm sorry I don't have the time to read through the entire thread bu I'm interested in the debate between Cdc and Rex. I think good points are made both ways. At age 23 I have quite varied tastes from jazz and a little classical to rock, all the way over to metal and a little hiphop, with various rock genres being my bread'n'butter. I like the musicality, detail and presentation of tubes and have yet to be entirely won over by the SS sond despite the punchier bass for rock and hiphop.

I agree that genres like metal and rap don't always sound "right" on my system BUT I've been able to hear some of this type of msuic through some very nice and very expensive SS gear and I didn't necessarily think that those systems were "voiced" better for those genres. I think it's more a matter of music production, not reproduction. The artists, producers, and engineers know full well that the vast majority of listeners of those genres are not going to be listening on high-end rigs, so the production may flat out not be there--this is espeically true for locally engineered indie rock bands. Some of hte tubbiness in the bass of rap and metal records, I'm finding, is either there on the album, or due to poor electrical and slow cabling in my system.

I listened to Type O Negative's World Coming Down the other day on my current rig and really enjoyed it. It was produced with alot of punch to the kick and bass with a nice wall of guitars. I'm auditioning some Kharma Ceramiques later this week and am curious to hear how it sounds on those puppies!