Ferrofluid

There’s nothing inaccurate about a cheap meter, they are all good. I see no relays in that crossover ( or any other crossover ) and diodes generally don’t go bad.

a meter would confirm to op that all caps are good and I bet they are as they used quality components.

I wouldn’t change a thing about the crossovers and I think that is good advice.

Personally, I would not spend a nickel on those crossovers , I’d triamp them but then I have an active crossover sitting in a drawer and the amps to run it, I would not recommend this route to OP.

No difference in meter accuracy? You would triamp passive crossovers?

doing nothing is not bad advice, these are nice speakers. 

Also, a trusted ferrofluid might cost $30 to $35.  If you feel that yours is drying up and you don't want just remove ferrofluid, this is still a good option. 

@timlub Tim. I left u a PM on here. Mike. 

Hi Mike, we'll, I've tried to get ahold of you. Audiogon blocks personal information sharing, I believe that it is to stop sales and transactions outside of Audiogon. I realize that I was just helping you with an issue and you certainly had no ill intent. Overall, it would  be nice if Audiogon created a form or something to share personal info when no one is trying to profit.

I don’t want to spin this into a Triamp thread but when I say triamp, I said use an active crossover , not passive .

You can call me a hypocrite as I have my energy 2.8’s passively triamped but I plead innocence as :

1) the manual says don’t use an active crossover with them.

2) I have three NAD 208 amps, might as well use them, right?