WHY CABLES MATTER!


I have seen the argument over and over again on why cables matter and the that wire is just wire and how scientifically it’s impossible for them to make a difference. The thing that surprises me the most is that different materials are used. Different shielding is used. Different connectors are used. Different braiding methods of the cables are used. Materials are sourced from different manufacturers and put through different creative processes but I always get some guy who comes on and says. WIRE IS WIRE AND YOU ARE NOT HEARING WHAT YOU ARE HEARING? To me it’s pure arrogance to think you know more than everybody else to the point where you tell me what we are hearing through my ears and we are not smart enough to know when are minds are playing trick on us. But using all these different materials, process and shielding and creative processes don’t make a difference. I spent the last 15 years trying all the cables I could try.  Thoughts anyone?

calvinj

The debate over whether different cables can make an audible difference in audio or video systems is a long-standing and contentious one. It's understandable that you've encountered passionate arguments on both sides of this issue. Let's break down some key points to consider in this ongoing discussion:

  1. Objective vs. Subjective Experience: This debate often boils down to objective scientific measurements versus subjective human perception. Objectively, well-designed cables should not introduce audible differences when transmitting signals within their specified capabilities. However, human perception can sometimes be influenced by expectations and psychological factors, leading some individuals to believe they hear differences that may not exist objectively.

  2. Engineering and Design: High-quality cables are engineered to meet specific standards and minimize signal loss or interference. Materials, shielding, connectors, and construction methods can all impact a cable's performance. In some cases, these differences might be subtle but still measurable.

  3. Price vs. Performance: There's often a debate about whether expensive cables are worth the investment. It's important to recognize that diminishing returns apply. Going from very cheap, poorly made cables to mid-range, well-constructed ones can have a noticeable impact. However, the difference between mid-range and extremely expensive cables may be negligible for most people's listening or viewing experiences.

  4. Placebo Effect: Human perception can be influenced by expectations and biases. If someone believes that an expensive cable will make a difference, they might perceive an improvement even if there isn't a significant objective difference.

  5. Room for Improvement: Sometimes, cable upgrades are more noticeable in high-end audio setups with high-quality components and carefully optimized listening environments. In such cases, small improvements might be more noticeable.

  6. Personal Preferences: Everyone's ears are different, and what one person perceives as an improvement, another may not. Personal preferences and the type of content being played can also influence perceptions.

  7. Scientific Studies: Some studies have attempted to address this debate scientifically, but results can vary. Many controlled, blind listening tests have failed to demonstrate consistent audible differences between cables, while others have shown some differences under specific conditions.

In conclusion, the debate over whether cables make an audible difference can be complex. It's important to approach the topic with an open mind and consider the scientific evidence, personal preferences, and budget constraints. Ultimately, if you believe you hear an improvement with a particular cable, and it enhances your listening or viewing experience, it may be worth it for you, even if others remain skeptical. The key is to strike a balance between personal satisfaction and the objective performance of your equipment.

To quote Bertrand Russell,  "If the matter is one that can be settled by observation, make the observation yourself"

Why is so much time wasted on this topic?

This reminds me of Julian Hirsch and his babbling. His ears seemed to be filled with lead. Many poor souls were deluded from his writings, when in truth the Hirsch-Houck labs were primitive. I was driven nuts as a salesman when customers would come in and cite him to assert you could hear no differences in amplifiers. Their jaw would hit the floor when the gross differences in sound characteristics were demonstrated- most people CAN hear the difference, if they bother to listen.

I think probably most of the newer cables that are OFC sounds similar but I had a pair of monster cables from 1990 that were 10 gauge non ofc and I wanted to try bi amping so I went on Amazon and found it cheap pair of 10 gauge 10 ft to match my existing cables.. shielded ofc cables from "Gearit".. the first thing I did was remove my existing cables and try the new cables on their own. now mind you I didn't even want to buy these cables I was expecting to send them back but when I switched them and went through my music I noticed I considerable difference. they were about 30% better than my old cables. I tried bi amping which did nothing I removed my old cables put them away and ordered another cable for my center channel.these cables made the music sound more delicate and layered for $75 for the three.. I couldn't imagine what someone spending astronomical amounts of money could possibly hear but I'm sure it would be better than these, so I'm a believer 6