Mastering for mono is not the same as just summing a stereo mix, so mono versions of albums can sound dramatically different from the stereo version. In the early days of stereo, it was often the case that the mono version sounded much better--it took some time before engineers mastered the art of stereo mastering. For example, in some respects the Beatles mono versions sound better than the stereo versions and that is even more decisively the case with some Cream albums. I have some Cream CDs that have both stereo and mono versions, so one can make an instantaneous comparison, and the mono sounds better.
Turning a stereo mix into a composite mono version is truly a crapshoot, particularly with more recent recordings. No one masters recordings these days with any consideration of how it will sound when played on a mono set up. Still, the sound can be surprisingly decent.