It SEEMS so true what you just said... So true...😊
But once this is said ...
How about the patents on the human genomes by Gates and others and how about patenting the seeds and after that being able to sold them after to the "poors" of africa erasing their traditional way of living and destroying their traditional seeds ?
Legal dont means legitimate , it seems ... So argued Vandana Shiva from India😁
Patent is legal not always legitimate ... For sure cable patent are not seeds patent ...But we discuss about patents in general here because you just claim that science will stop without "patents" ... I dont think so myself by the way ...but i cannot enter this matter here ...
Without patent the so useful research about viruses by corporations will go away for sure and many others criminal stranglehold by corporations on all aspects of life... Who control the "patent" office by the way ?
And what about the patent on A. I. by corporations more powerful than nations ?
In the same way, if someone cannot afford "the patent" price, nor the "patented" product then he cannot eat, or afford the price of education, nor he cannot be cured ; We must stay legal and patent must be respected or all the progress wheel will stop ...
But this wheel of progress turn for the benefit of whom now ?
Is it really true that without "patent" the wheel of progress will stop ? Is it not instead the way we understand "profit" which will be modified ? Research will not stop ...
Just questions i throw, because i am not so sure about this claim validity...And some here are so sure not only about patents as they are legally constituted (a legitimate status versus his official legal status) but they are so sure about the moral status of everybody here in a very clear classification ...😁
I must be a confused mind or are they simplistic mind ?... 😊
My questions are here but it is better for me not to judge anybody ...
I dont see myself too my own beam when reading about the straw in their eyes...
I was thinking aloud...
Interestig how people are arguing that intellectual property doesn’t exist. Without patents and IP rights, research would go away.
Jerry