i believe you ,even if i am not used it, that digital Eq and Analog EQ are not only different but can be helpful for some task the other cannot do so well... As mechanical room control can be useful and work in a way the other two could not do so well ... They are all tools which must work together when it is possible ...
And i believe you because hearing is not completely understood and Fourier maps so useful they could be technologically and they are in hearing helps devices for example , thanks then to Fourier methods of mapping for all modern audio tech; , but so useful it is hearing cannot be reduced to be a Fourier engine anyway and it stay not so well known territory to explore with many competing theories or ways of mapping it ...
After all, Choueiri investigation in stereo system hearing flaws and his own correcting filters solutions for example did not have more than 15 years ....
@mahgister , I don’t believe he has tried what Miro and I have tried. I am pressing him for a specific answer because Miro and I are really on to something and I want others to try and he is blanket discrediting us with his snide comments about digital being better than analog for ALL applications. It’s just not right. It’s just not true!
Audiophiles are fearful of treble boost because of people like @mijostyn discrediting without trying the studio proven methods that really really work well in the home too. How can I get my passion and experience with this one topic out there for others to try when he keeps running it down without personal experience? It’s not right.
