What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'?

What people choose to play on that equipment is a different matter- some of which some people might regard as musical while others might not.

So the topic, IMO, is bit too broad in the context of this thread.

Exactly and again, exactly. I guess opinion and taste might enter into it?

Some Mirriam Webster definitions of "music"

: vocal, instrumental, or mechanical sounds having rhythm, melody, or harmony

: an agreeable sound : euphony

If one accepts any of those definitions of "music,"  it sure seems as if opinion and taste enter in to the equation. 

I already said : TASTE THERE IS. but musicality is not about INDIVIDUAL taste but about a collective acoustic experience and knowledge ... You dont get it ?

It seems you dont get it...

It seems your are unable to understand that your point is empty of content :

Using the dictionary definition about harmonious and euphony  only goes further in my direction : acoustic ...

To be "pleasing to the ears" which is the definition of euphony , is not a definition concerning individual taste but collective humanity ...It is  a culturally biased  definition for sure, culturally biased ; but nevermind these biases are  easy to overcome by any attentive listener, euphony  ask for optimal acoustic conditions  to be experienced as such...A  talented and trained playing musician in a good acoustic room sound euphonic , it is not a taste question ... Do you get it ?

But like a rabbit using a dictionary instead of thinking  you circle around your own tail ... Acoustic has nothing to do with INDIVIDUAL taste or about the  idiosyncrasies of a single perceiving subject , acoustic parameters were created by studies or ALL  humankind  specific abilities...

The fact that some with a boom box on their back revendicate this a "musical" will not transform some music in a "musical" event even if some "taste" it with delight ...

It is useless to argue more ... You dont want to understand , your "taste" is all you have , keep it ...

@mahgister 

Why should I, or why should anyone, accept your word salad as the only definition of "music" and/or "musical" and reject Mirriam Webster?  Please explain.

You need more thinking

here ...

I dont contradict the dictionary... Everybody who read my post can see it .. 😊

I contradict you simplistic appeal to the dictionary as the ONLY means to define musicality...

For sure musical is a question of taste ...

It is a common place fact my friend ...

But musical is ALSO an acoustic specific concept ... A dictionary dont replace acoustic book ..

By the way speaking of my "word salad" have you listened the acoustician in the video i suggested to you speaking  about how to evaluate "musical" experience, by analysing the experiences cumulated of all people and doing so define in a better way what is "musicality " ?

is it a word salad too ?

@mahgister

Why should I, or why should anyone, accept your word salad as the only definition of "music" and/or "musical" and reject Mirriam Webster? Please explain.