AVERAGE
I’m no expert, I post what I have read by reliable sources.
It’s very hard to believe a diamond can wear so quickly (on average), however, the forces occurring in the groove are tremendous.
Jico is the source of the AVERAGE life expectancy chart Soundsmith included in their article about stylus shapes, based on Jico’s EXPERT research.
It is qualified, based on technical performance (not based on occurence to damage grooves, I think our biggest concern)
"stage the wear has reached the point where distortion at 15kHz surpasses the level specified by Jico for a new stylus. (Which I believe is 3%)."
Many have said they get 1000, 2000 hours, that is great, saves a LOT of money: but according to Jico they are statistically playing well into the % of distortion, perhaps unable to hear it. After all, by the time we can afford good stuff, we are OLD (on average), ability to hear high frequencies diminished (on average).Groove damage may or may not be occurring after a certain point.
……………………………………………
MAJORITY
I’m not in the majority, are you? Of course we are all part of the majority even if we get superior results than the majority’s lower average.
I have read several times that it is found that the MAJORITY of wear is on only one side, because the anti-skate has not been properly adjusted.
Which means: the MAJORITY of vinyl listeners are not getting balanced performance, (audible and stylus/groove wear) from the 1st hour or beginning at some point since a cartridge was improperly factory/dealer aligned, or subsequently adjusted/replaced.
AND those misaligned stylus wear earlier than properly aligned, contributing to the AVERAGE short life they find.
Alignment tools and skills are of vital importance in Vinyl systems.
…………………………………………………………
A spherical stylus (any stylus) does not know what cantilever/cartridge it is on, or how it is mounted (nude or bonded).
Jico says Spherical wear much more quickly than other stylus shapes, based on their research findings, AND quite logical considering the tremendous groove forces are concentrated on the smallest amount of groove wall contact, spherical the least contact area thus highest wear.
“The Shibata was developed just because of the wear observed from elliptical styli when developing CD4, in the years just before 1970. In order for an elliptical to track CD4 45khz, exceedingly high VTF was needed, and wear was too high. Shibata improved that a lot, and today several line contacts have equal or even greater contact patch compared to Shibata.
A MicroLine tracking at 2g, for instance. It’s contact patch is much larger”
That’s advanced stylus shapes compared to Elliptical which has far more contact surface than spherical.
…………………………………………..
This is why, On AVERAGE, a more expensive advanced stylus shape does not cost as much over time, their larger contact surface minimizing wear to both itself and your grooves.
IF your stylus lasts 3 times what Jico says, the difference between Spherical and Advanced Stylus Shape is still relative x3, and the cost per hour of an advanced stylus shape is even lower, 3 times lower? At some point the advanced stylus shape is SAVING you money, all the while delivering better performance/less groove wear!!!
No matter what, cartridge alignment is FUNDAMENTALLY CRITICAL.
........................................
Back to $12k cartridge: no way is that going to save you money!!!