2. digital
  3. 1234444992

WAV or Apple Lossless Encoder?

We plan on purchasing a Wadia 170i Transport to use with our Museatex Bidat. As we have several hundred CD's that we want to transfer, we want to begin the process of downloading them into our itunes library. I was surprised when I read the Wadia owners manual that it appears to recommend using the WAV encoder and does also mention mention Apple Lossless as an alternative. We use a PC rather than a MAC (sorry) and I know that WAV was originally developed for the PC, but from every thing that I've read, Lossless is the superior solution. Anyone compare these two and notice a difference? I only want to do this once.
conedison8
peter_s
1,333 posts
 
Wishful thinking. You can never recover information that you lost when compressing the files into MP3 or other lossy formats.
brianmgrarcom
1,317 posts
 
Peter is correct Audiowoman. The option you speak of is designed to convert a full size file, like a .wav, to Apple Lossless.

Brian
audiowoman
249 posts
 
thanks guys, I'll start ripping!
usarmyvet91
83 posts
 
Well on paper you would think wav would sound better. Wav is a total cd transfer with out any compression. Apple lossles does compress audio not much but it does. I have tried both and it's hard to tell the difference between them. However i have found that wav sounds better on some transfers. When you do go with wav its harder to get the art work.
brianmgrarcom
1,317 posts
 
Apple lossles does compress audio not much but it does.
You talk not of what you know.
More to discover