A.I. music


Possibly of interest: "the current rush to advance generative AI technology could be "spiritually, politically, and economically" corrosive. By effectively removing people, like musicians, from algorithms and tech that create new content, elements of society that were once connections between people are turned into "objects" that become less interesting and meaningful, Lanier explained.

"As soon as you have the algorithms taking music from musicians, mashing it up into new music, and then not paying the musicians, gradually you start to undermine the economy because what happens to musicians now happens to everybody later," Lanier said.

He noted that, while this year has been the "year of AI," next year the world is going to be "flooded, flooded with AI-generated music."


https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-jaron-lanier-ai-advancing-without-human-dignity-undermines-everything-2023-10

128x128hilde45

 

Trying to keep up here but there are too many words. I will ask A.I. to summarize. ;-)

 

I am sorry as all know i am too verbose...

But how to describe complex matter in few sentences ?

😁😊😉

I will be surprized if A.I. can relate together Cantor, Mystics methods, Shai Haran Grothendieck, Mochizuki and Anirban work in one meaningful explanation...

But ask him he will answer this : The prime numbers is the core of the works between all these names... But he will affirm to you that there is no relation between Cantor works and the prime numbers distribution... The only exception will be a note in a book of Hao Wang about the unexplained intuition of Godel about a relation between the existence of measurable cardinals and the prime distribution ... An idea so deep no one ever explained to my knowledge ...

It is what A. I. chat gpt will say to you if it is efficient ... 😊

but i doubt he will explain well the link between mystical methods and Cantor but it is possible ... Ask him ... And report here ...

For those who want to understand how could be formulated a philosophical epistemology which is non reductionist and when it was formulated i suggest this article from "medium" excellent magazine internet :

https://designforsustainability.medium.com/the-tip-of-the-iceberg-goethe-s-aphorisms-on-the-theory-of-nature-and-science-ba6e12ebd5f1

i recommend also three books on Goethe by Henri Bortoft a physicist who is the best contemporary student of Goethe epistemology... His book : "Taken appearences serriously " is stunning read... Goethe is only on par with the greatest human scientific and artistic geniuses in one individual as Leonardo Da Vinci who anyway used the same methods in natural science ...

It will be an antidote to reductionism A.I. poisonning promoted by the like of Kurzweil...

‘The Tip of the Iceberg’ Goethe’s Aphorisms on the theory of Nature and Science

Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe and the Emergence of Holistic Science; D.C. Wahl, 2001

By the way as in Goethe the whole is present in the parts... In Anirban Bandyopadhyay works the Whole (cosmos) is already in the part(brain) the part contain the whole and express it...

This is why A.B. who work on the first Indian quantum computer dont understand the relation between classical and quantum in the same way as most physicists...

Also his insistence on the concept of time and timing is crux of the matter... I will stop here ... You must read him ...It is not for the fainted heart because all is new in his approach nothing resemble actual neural network llm models at all ...

Genius dont walk they fly .