Bryston 7B3 vs 4B3: Extra Cost Worthwhile?


Now that my dealer said he can deliver and unbox my amp the weight issue has been resolved. I don’t expect to be moving them as this is my end game system. At my age end game has real meaning. So I decided on Bryston and the 4B3. But then I got to thinking maybe I should go all out and get the 7B3 mono blocks.  They are twice the price of the 4B3. For that additional expense I would hope and expect that once I heard them I would not be able to go back to the 4B3. However if the difference in perceived SQ is better but marginal the extra cost would not be worthwhile. I’m not looking for the ability to play loud but am looking for speaker control, dynamics, soundstage, etc., improvements that are clearly and unequivocally heard. So has anyone been done this road with these amps? If so please share your experiences 

jfrmusic

My speaker is not demanding. 6 Ohm Harbeth C7es-XD. But not concerned with playing loud. Looking for control and dynamics as I listen to mostly Classical. 

For a Harbeth a 4B3 is more than enough. I think the neutral Bryston is a good choice for the Harbeth. I would have gone with the Benchmark AHB2 in mono myself.  I like the top end on the AHB2 more. The bottom end on the 4B3 is better.

@yyzsantabarbara 

That is another option as the AHB2 is my current amp. Some have said not to use a stereo amp in bridge mode as distortion increases. My impeadance is 6 so half of that probably not an issue for the Benchmark. 
 

what SQ advantages did you experience with AHB2 bridged?

@jfmusic I know the AHB2 really well. I owned that amp so many times. In both stereo and mono form. Your warm Harbeth will go nicely with the ultra-clean sound of the AHB2. Now that sound is not for everyone, but I like it. Some people find it sterile. 

The AHB2 monos are rated at 6 Ohm, not at 2 Ohm like the stereo AHB2. The mono AHB2 becomes quieter and louder than the stereo AHB2. Otherwise, the sound is the same. The power delivery is what is different. Sometimes the stereo is better than the monos and vica versa. It depends on your speaker. For the Harbeth, monos would be better. The AHB2 does suffer some of the same things as other stereo amps going into mono, but it is a bit more capable in this regard. You may want to ask Rory Rail at Benchmark for their reasons why they like monos (of course they sell more too).

I have a speaker somewhat like your Harbeth, the Yamaha NS5000. It is also a 6 Ohm speaker. The single AHB2 drives it well, though monos will provide greater range in the volume. I did not like mono in my old 2 Ohm Thiel CS3.7, preferred the stereo AHB2. That did not have much power in stereo, so I gave up on the AHB2 for that setup.

I came back to the AHB2 with the NS5000. I did a shootout with the AHB2 stereo | Sanders Magtech | CODA #16. I preferred the Sanders and #16 over the AHB2, mainly because of the greater power.

The AHB2 was also a tiny bit harder on top with the Zylon drivers of the NS5000. Even though I think the NS5000 is slightly warm I think a warmer amp than the AHB2 is needed with the NS5000 for my ears, but not too warm.

If you are interested, I have a 1-year-old silver AHB2 sitting idle that I can sell. I only expect to use it again in about 2 years when RAAL 1995 comes out with the replacement for the SR1a earphone.

BTW - I use Audience FrontRow cables with the AHB2 and all speakers, but the Benchmark speaker cables with SpeakON termination worked well with a bright headphone I owned.