@jfrmusic My friend who has an incredible ear, heard my DAC3B and he had issues with the upper mid lower treble forward using the AHB2. We liked the warmer Schitt Yggdrasil+ LIM DAC with this setup. However, when the AHB2 was switched to the warmer Class A CODA #16 we liked the BM DAC3B more. This was with the Yamaha NS5000 speaker which is a bit like the Harbeth 40.1. The AHB2 + Yggdrasil+ LIM was still not perfect with the NS5000. I think it is the drivers of the NS5000 are not the best match for the AHB2.
Here is a little blurb about the ears involved in my home demo.
Interestingly, we both have the BM DAC3 and use it successfully for some purposes.
Here is the content of 2 emails I have from Rory Rail at Benchmark.
Yes, it will work well in your application. The feed-forward error correction keeps the amplifier distortion-free when driving low impedances. (asking about the low impedance Theil CS3.7 speaker)
The amp will sound identical in either mode. In fact, distortion measures the same in either mode. The only difference is that the mono mode plays about 6dB louder.
Best regards,
Rory Rall
Sales Mgr.
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc.
With the AHB2 monos you do suffer some low impedance continuous power. Say running at that impedance for 30 mins. However, your speakers do not dip down there. The distortion is not increased like in other amps doing the same thing. My old Thiel CS3.7 worked OK with the monos, but worked better with a very powerful amp like the CODA #16, Parasound A21+, CODA #8. These are better at low impedance needs. A stereo AHB2 is better than the monos with low impedence but the power tops out around 190 watts at 2 Ohms. My CODA #16 is 600 watts at 2 Ohm in comparison.