refurbished NAD M5 vs new SCD-XA5400ES

The NAD does look better built. I was wondering if the Sony just had some new technology that makes it better sounding just cause its newer.

Eg. it has the Dual R-Core Power Transformers which I have no clue what they are!!!

Curious if you need balanced outputs. The Sony cd players
usually do not have this. Also the NAD does HDCD and SACD
discs. You do not see that on many players. Tough choice.
I have used an M5 and it was surprised me.

The sony SACD players are good. The NAD M5 was also very good on redbook.

FOLLOW UP.........I just checked the Sony website.
I see the new SACD player DOES have balanced out.

INTERESTING.............

Yes The M5 has balanced out, as the M3 Integrated has balanced in. I forgot about the HDCD, and HDCD is not totally dead. The latest Gold Cd releases from Audio Fidelity, mastered by Steve Hoffman are HDCD. My guess is they both have strengths, and you will always have someone either that does not like a unit, while the next guy says it blows everything away ? Crazy Hobby !

So are we agreed that For around a $1000, for 2 channel SACD, the refurbished ND M5 and the new Sony SCD XA5400ES are the best choices?

ie they would sound better than some of the older used marantz in the same price range, or even the used SCD777es which is slightly more expensive?

Thanks