For me definitely.
For you? IMHO probably
On the whole, most people will agree that a hard drive based transport will out perform all but the very best CD transports.
While the devil is in the details, all computer based systems basically work the same way:
- a CD is ripped to a hard drive at pre-determined resolution and format - this tends to be along PCvsMac lines.
- the metatags for the CD are populated (name, title etc) automatically from a web database accessed by your software
- the files are organized in any number of browser or player metaphors - Squeezebox includes a web browser
- using the file organizing software, the files are retrieved from the hard drive. Most often the file is moved out of the computer via USB, SPDIF, Toslink, Ethernet or WiFi to a DAC
- The same DAC can be used with either type of transport - hard drive or platter based (the Squeezebox comes with a built in DAC so in addition to SPDIF it can also output analog to a suitable input)
It is very important to understand that a single set of files (ie a hard drive full of rips) can be accessed by multiple kinds of software and hardware. It is very common to access one library with both a Mac and a PC running iTunes, an iPod and a Squeezebox. This is why closed proprietary systems and formats have largely failed.
This is a transitional period - there are certainly lots of people who have both a traditional CD player and a computer based system in various rooms of their house
I tend to think about the decision to go to computer based audio as a lifestyle choice as much as a technology choice. Most often people who select computer audio solutions do so because:
- they can achieve better audio quality for the same or less money
- they enjoy being able to access every nook and cranny of their collections, make playlists etc
- they are thrilled to remove the physical presence of a large CD library from their living space. I would say filing but some people really enjoy the tactile experience of managing their collections
- they already have music on hard drives for their iPods and other devices and they have experienced the benefits.
- they like to listen to Internet radio
- they want to be able to distribute a single library to one or more locations in their home or office. They do not want to maintain multiple copies. Nor do they want to constantly ferry CDs from room to room. The Squeezebox is particularly well suited to distribution.
The mantra of this movement is "rip once, use many"
So - if lower cost, higher quality and greater flexibility is appealing, then this might be a logical way for you to go.
Depending on your very specific situation and plans, it may or may not also be true that a Squeezebox is the best solution for your system.
You probably need to do some homework - there are a million threads on the by now very broad subject of computer based audio.
For you? IMHO probably
On the whole, most people will agree that a hard drive based transport will out perform all but the very best CD transports.
While the devil is in the details, all computer based systems basically work the same way:
- a CD is ripped to a hard drive at pre-determined resolution and format - this tends to be along PCvsMac lines.
- the metatags for the CD are populated (name, title etc) automatically from a web database accessed by your software
- the files are organized in any number of browser or player metaphors - Squeezebox includes a web browser
- using the file organizing software, the files are retrieved from the hard drive. Most often the file is moved out of the computer via USB, SPDIF, Toslink, Ethernet or WiFi to a DAC
- The same DAC can be used with either type of transport - hard drive or platter based (the Squeezebox comes with a built in DAC so in addition to SPDIF it can also output analog to a suitable input)
It is very important to understand that a single set of files (ie a hard drive full of rips) can be accessed by multiple kinds of software and hardware. It is very common to access one library with both a Mac and a PC running iTunes, an iPod and a Squeezebox. This is why closed proprietary systems and formats have largely failed.
This is a transitional period - there are certainly lots of people who have both a traditional CD player and a computer based system in various rooms of their house
I tend to think about the decision to go to computer based audio as a lifestyle choice as much as a technology choice. Most often people who select computer audio solutions do so because:
- they can achieve better audio quality for the same or less money
- they enjoy being able to access every nook and cranny of their collections, make playlists etc
- they are thrilled to remove the physical presence of a large CD library from their living space. I would say filing but some people really enjoy the tactile experience of managing their collections
- they already have music on hard drives for their iPods and other devices and they have experienced the benefits.
- they like to listen to Internet radio
- they want to be able to distribute a single library to one or more locations in their home or office. They do not want to maintain multiple copies. Nor do they want to constantly ferry CDs from room to room. The Squeezebox is particularly well suited to distribution.
The mantra of this movement is "rip once, use many"
So - if lower cost, higher quality and greater flexibility is appealing, then this might be a logical way for you to go.
Depending on your very specific situation and plans, it may or may not also be true that a Squeezebox is the best solution for your system.
You probably need to do some homework - there are a million threads on the by now very broad subject of computer based audio.