Push-pull Tube Amps and autoformers


I’ve gone and done it and decided to marry my 1.7i Maggies to mono Quicksilver M60s that only output 60w per. Crazy, I know. But the sound is sweet, and mellow for my jazz, though yes, at lower volumes, and they certainly do not allow the Maggies a full sprint, like with the Parasound A21+ that I can switch to (Luxman AS-55) when I want to throw-down serious dBs. But still, I would like a bit more punch from the QS. So, that led me to Paul Speltzer’s Zero Boxes. I talked with Paul (great guy to talk things through with), and he wasn’t certain that the “push-pull” QS would benefit from the Zeros, (because they were originally designed more for OTL amps like Atmospheres.) But, after talking it through awhile, we thought it worth the 60 day return trial period to see if the Zeros might help add that punch, if I use the 8 or 16 ohm taps. They arrive in a couple of weeks, so I’ll know soon enough. But, in the meantime, any of you have input, or experience with using autoformers (or auto transformers) with push-pull amps like QS? (Please give me a pass on bad speaker/amp impedance matching, ok? I knowingly signed-up for low-powered tubes for my 84db Maggies because others I trust on this forum have had good things to say about doing crazy sh-t like that. And, its just a trial. So, chime in gently, please.

128x128audiodidact

Ralph, can you point me in the direction of someone using a beefy solid state power amplifier that are using the Speltz zeros, so I may hear from them their opinion. Mcintosh continues to use autoformers in many of their designs, but a Krell, Boulder or even a Parasound are able to handle the impedance dips in most speakers. It is my opinion, and this will not change, that the Speltz units are band aids for tube amplifiers, such as you OTLs. A properly designed amp should be able to handle this task. I see no need for a speaker with very low impedance dips, nor of low efficiency. Can we just leave it at that. My best, always, MrD. 

"It is my opinion, and this will not change..." 

There's a lot of that going around. 

Perhaps Autoformers are band aids for inefficient speakers?

Ralph, can you point me in the direction of someone using a beefy solid state power amplifier that are using the Speltz zeros, so I may hear from them their opinion.

@mrdecibel Yes- talk to Steve McCormack of McCormack Audio.

Perhaps Autoformers are band aids for inefficient speakers?

No- its more for reducing the distortion of an amp driving a lower impedance. All amps make more distortion into lower impedances; the ear interprets this distortion as greater harshness and lack of detail. This is why low impedance speakers are not the best investment if you want to get the most out of your amplifier dollar investment.

By increasing the load impedance on the amp, you get smoother and more detailed sound (because distortion is reduced). You might also get less power if the amp is solid state. I see the 3dB increase in power you get with 4 Ohms with a solid state amp as a rather weak rationalization since in high end audio, its usually about the presentation rather than the sound pressure.

Ralph, I am not the one who stated " Perhaps autoformers are band aids for inefficient speakers?" rhg3 stated that. I know autoformers are for impedance matching. I stated both, speakers with low impedance dips AND low efficiency are of zero interest to me. My best, MrD.