If A.I. took the place of musicians, would you listen to it?

I feel that I'm qualified to contribute to this discussion, as I've been a professional musician for about 50 years now.

We should think about differentiating music generated by A.I. and the performance of it. There is an element of musical performance that is innately human, a personality if you will, that is basic to the way music communicates to us on an emotional level. It may be possible to generate an appealing, even sophisticated piece of music via A.I. but at the present moment I don't think A.I. is developed enough to perform that music in a way that touches us. That has to come from an actual musician. So, in short, yes I would probably listen to a piece generated by A.I. as long as it is performed by a human musician who finds in it something worth expressing. 

When we perceive music, especially the music that we're fond of or interested in, it lights up pretty much every corner of our brains, so our responses are emotional, sensual, and intellectual all at once. Our visual centers, our language centers, our memory circuits are all engaged in this process. Music that is performed artificially (i.e. synthesized) lacks the necessary nuances to accomplish this. We recognize it as "music," but it won't hold our attention for very long.

Perhaps a useful analogy here would be the story of how the test-screenings of the original "Shrek" movie went so catastrophically wrong. The producers had intended this film for young children, but the kids in the test audience got scared and started crying. What happened? Well, they ran afoul of something called the "uncanny valley" effect, sometimes referred to as the 94% factor (and I hope I got that number right). The characters were close to real (94%,let's say), but not close enough. Princess Fiona wasn't seen as a sophisticated cartoon, but instead as a real human with something deeply wrong with her. 

This, I suspect, is how A.I. music would be processed by our very human brains. It might not scare us, but we will subconsciously process it as real music with something deeply wrong with it. 

Have I actually heard any music generated by A.I.? Well, the answer is: I don't know. I certainly don't seek it out, but with music being so omnipresent in our lives I guess I must have encountered it at some point in a movie or TV show soundtrack, or accompanying one or another YouTube video. I just tend to tune that stuff out of my consciousness because it doesn't communicate anything, it's just ambient noise.

The Mechanical

I wonder if AI could make such statements as above and be truly aware of what they implied.

Simple question… If you heard a song on the radio, and you really liked it, and then you found out it was AI, would you stop liking it? Would you no longer listen to it?

Cooper52, your comment about the "uncanny valley effect" is, I think, much to my point. AI music will sound like music, but something might reveal itself to be "not quite right."

Thanks for your comment.

Music, for me, is about the human connection.  I don't appreciate it as a product.  If I can't relate to the musician struggling with their instrument or find an emotional connection with the composer I quickly become disinterested.

Most (not all) modern pop "music" bores me, mostly because it seems artificially produced. Quantizers, beat machines, pitch correction and the lack of performance errors sucks the life out of any performance.

Composition, on the other hand, is one area AI can make contributions.  It will be interesting to hear what AI can come up with.  I can be impressed by looking at the elegance of a Bach fugue, but it isn't until I hear it performed that it can move me to tears. I think it will always take a human to do that.