It's a an interesting back and forth, but I see it as two potential forms of bias.
1. This guy will argue on behalf of anything that costs more, because he makes more. Simple and obvious.
2. Reviewers always rave about everything, and this eternal product optimism is their nature, because positivity moves units and keeps them in the good graces of the industry. This too simple and obvious.
Now not to go too far into it, but I do know some professional reviewers on a more casual basis and even though this item (MU2) falls outside of their typical price and functional capacity likings. Meaning they typical don't advocate product's in this price range, and they more often then not advocate for separate systems out of reasons for tailoring and personalization, they all unanimously and unequivocally love the MU2 and say that it's better then more expensive separate systems.
I'm gonna have to do some deep soul searching and hope to get an audition of a MU2, because my Innuos Statement, Tambaqui, possibly my Yamaha C-5000 may just have found a replacement should the reviewers be correct in their assertion.
I'm kinda skeptical. I like my system, and still have questions, and am somewhat Roon-phobic, but we'll see.
Probably will take me 6 months to a year to sort all this out.